加拿大华人论坛 美国求职招聘倪老师对托福作文推荐修改稿的修改

在加拿大

* * * * 倪老师对托福作文推荐修改稿的修改 * * * *（原稿及其修改稿可能的出处：http://www.doc88.com/p-99893321359.html）：某知名培训机构推荐的托福作文之修改稿：The lecturer claims that the new policy, which allows people to work four days a week instead of five, will have negative effects for companies as well as society. This claim is not in agreement with that of the reading passage, which suggests that such a policy will be beneficial.According to the lecture, a company that allows employees to have fewer working hours is likely to hire more people to ensure that it meets normal levels of productivity. If this occurs, expenses for training and medical insurance will inevitably rise. The reading passage, by contrast, suggests that employees who enjoy more leisure time make fewer mistakes and work more efficiently, leading to increased profits for the enterprise.The second point of difference between the lecture and the reading passage concerns the impact of the policy on the unemployment rate. The lecturer asserts that for the sake of saving money, employers might raise their expectations of 4-day employees rather than recruit more people. Consequently, employees who work 4 days will be forced to finish what they did in 5 days previously, and no additional jobs will be created. （篇幅所限，以下略，全文见倪老师博客）Finally, the lecturer argues that under the new policy, employees will experience not only decreased quality of life (as shorter working hours will translate into less pay), but also fewer chances to be promoted to supervisory positions. However, the reading passage contends that more leisure hours can create opportunities to strengthen family ties and allow employees to develop private interests, making them feel more satisfied with their lives.倪老师对上述修改稿的修改：The lecturer claims that the new policy, which allows people to work four days a week instead of five, will have negative effects on companies as well as society. This claim is not in agreement with that of the reading passage, which suggests that such a policy will be beneficial.According to the lecture, a company with fewer working hours is likely to hire more people to keep normal productivity. As a result, expenses for training and medical insurance will inevitably rise. The reading passage, by contrast, suggests that employees with more leisure will work more efficiently by making fewer mistakes, which leads to increased profits for the enterprise.The second difference between the lecture and the reading passage concerns the impact of the policy on unemployment. The lecturer asserts that to save money, employers would rather raise their expectation of 4-day employees than recruit more people. The 4-day workers, therefore, will be forced to finish what they would complete in 5 days, and no additional jobs will be created for society. （篇幅所限，以下略，全文见倪老师博客）Finally, the lecturer warns that under the new policy, employees will suffer not only a worse life (as shorter working hours will translate into less pay), but also fewer chances to be promoted to supervisory positions. However, the reading passage contends that more leisure hours open the door to strengthening family ties and developing personal interests, which means a satisfying life.免费试讲，真好才学。邮箱：[email protected]倪老师教学理念详见：http://blog.sina.com.cn/mrni或电话咨询13910005403（如遇授课请稍候）。北京房山

 ·加拿大新闻 收到这条短信别删！加拿大Rogers/Fido/Chatr用户有望领到一笔钱！
·加拿大新闻 别克GL8焕新登场，配炫酷大屏与舒适座椅，动力强劲
·加拿大新闻 暴雨再临大温本周万圣节份外“可怕”孩子拿糖要穿雨衣
·加拿大新闻 TD预测：加拿大房市明年迎拐点房价全线看涨
·加拿大新闻 又一家电集团造车，打造移动客厅，夏普首款车有没有看头？
 ·汽车 可选附加服务和租赁缺口保险
·汽车 马自达6e