在加拿大
In Kanes v. Minister of Citizenship and Immigration (1993), 72 F.T.R. 226 (F.C.T.D.), Cullen J. held that the delay in processing the applicant's claim was unreasonable not because of its specific duration, but because it resulted in a severe substantive detriment to the applicant following a legislative amendment. He stated at paragraph 26 that, in such circumstances, "the change in the legislation cannot be used to operate to the detriment of the applicant." Likewise, in Meikle v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) (1997), 137 F.T.R. 304 (F.C.T.D.), Heald D.J. ruled [at paragraph 17] that a delay of 20 months was unreasonable where it "had the effect of depriving the applicant of rights already vested in him".Kanes一案中,拖延处理是不合理的,不是因为期限长,而是对申请人导致了特别实质性的损害(在变法之后),在这种情况下,“法规的变动不能被用于损害申请人”。类似的,在Meikle 诉. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) (1997)一案中,Heald判决“20个月的拖延是不合理的,这已起到剥夺申请人权利之效果”
评论
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]他们欺瞒上帝偷偷拨回时间They fool God secretly timing of the reversal 赏
评论
回复: 举两个案例,大家研究下,当前危局下可能有用这个是正道,难兄难弟们都来瞧瞧~~
·加拿大新闻 安全为信仰2025广州车展沃尔沃携全系安全旗舰亮相
·加拿大新闻 阿省联动释放中加贸易合作强信号!周六罢工继续!
·加拿大新闻 卑诗省长和亚省省长 再就油管油轮问题公开互呛
·加拿大新闻 卡尼与多国领袖联合发声明忧美方“和平方案”削弱乌克兰防卫
·加拿大新闻 [G20峰会] 卡尼会晤马克龙 谈重建加沙与乌克兰战事发展
·汽车 两名司机比一名司机便宜
·汽车 新速度区和摄像头 Oxford St Darlinghurst