在加拿大
In Kanes v. Minister of Citizenship and Immigration (1993), 72 F.T.R. 226 (F.C.T.D.), Cullen J. held that the delay in processing the applicant's claim was unreasonable not because of its specific duration, but because it resulted in a severe substantive detriment to the applicant following a legislative amendment. He stated at paragraph 26 that, in such circumstances, "the change in the legislation cannot be used to operate to the detriment of the applicant." Likewise, in Meikle v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) (1997), 137 F.T.R. 304 (F.C.T.D.), Heald D.J. ruled [at paragraph 17] that a delay of 20 months was unreasonable where it "had the effect of depriving the applicant of rights already vested in him".Kanes一案中,拖延处理是不合理的,不是因为期限长,而是对申请人导致了特别实质性的损害(在变法之后),在这种情况下,“法规的变动不能被用于损害申请人”。类似的,在Meikle 诉. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) (1997)一案中,Heald判决“20个月的拖延是不合理的,这已起到剥夺申请人权利之效果”
评论
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]他们欺瞒上帝偷偷拨回时间They fool God secretly timing of the reversal 赏
评论
回复: 举两个案例,大家研究下,当前危局下可能有用这个是正道,难兄难弟们都来瞧瞧~~
·加拿大新闻 新款本田飞度怎么样?外观造型个性运动,车辆配置还需提升
·加拿大新闻 加拿大保守党确认:博励治下届大选需另寻选区,席位还给原议
·加拿大新闻 不排除推汽油版可能奔驰“小G”最新消息曝光
·加拿大新闻 加拿大华人买房踩雷:被追缴7万税,95%写加拿大人名下也没用
·加拿大新闻 快检查!多伦多知名华人超市出售的牛肉紧急召回,12家门店全
·汽车 珀斯最佳汽车经纪人
·汽车 6 或 4 活塞