加拿大华人论坛 加拿大留学移民世界日报采访Tim Leahy表示：C38不影响诉讼，可控诉C38违宪！

在加拿大

评论
回复: 世界日报：C38不影响诉讼，可控诉C38违宪！顶！

评论
靠家里，你可能会当上公主。靠男人，你可能当上王妃。但靠自己，才能当上女王。 超赞 赏 D David20070608 0$(VIP 0) 2202012-05-06#3 回复: 世界日报：C38不影响诉讼，可控诉C38违宪！只要有一线希望，我们都要战斗到底！

评论
FN: 2007.6.8VO:ISKIELTS:7,7.5,5.5,5.5 超赞 赏 P paradiseunderthesunGuest 0$(VIP ) 2012-05-06#4 回复: 世界日报：C38不影响诉讼，可控诉C38违宪！加拿大是三权分立的国家，保守党虽然是多数党，不代表可以凌驾于立法和司法之上。三权分立的制度下不可能产生独裁者。

评论
回复: 世界日报：C38不影响诉讼，可控诉C38违宪！加拿大是三权分立的国家，保守党虽然是多数党，不代表可以凌驾于立法和司法之上。三权分立的制度下不可能产生独裁者。点击展开...嗯，但愿如此，现在是检验、考验三权分立制度的时候了，91的命运或许就是三权分立制度的试金石。

评论
回复: 世界日报：C38不影响诉讼，可控诉C38违宪！顶

评论
回复: 世界日报：C38不影响诉讼，可控诉C38违宪！Tim律师在工作，在为被加拿大政府抛弃的可怜的人挣取权力，他也没有在胡说，这就是个好律师，既使是为了钱！

评论
回复: 世界日报：C38不影响诉讼，可控诉C38违宪！

评论
227；BJ；2010-04-22，投妥；2010-07-19，RN；2010-11月中旬，补料投妥；2012-1-26，IP；2012-2-6，ME；2012-10-9，DM；2012-11-16，visa+LP！ 超赞 赏 S shaohaiyue 0$(VIP 0) 1342012-05-06#9 回复: 世界日报：C38不影响诉讼，可控诉C38违宪！很好的律师。建议大家把信息多传到印度网站上， 让印度团多鼎力相助。

评论
回复: 世界日报：C38不影响诉讼，可控诉C38违宪！这是这几天看到的最好消息。本来就纳闷，这么明显的独裁性质的条款怎么就能提出来了呢？

评论
Brian 超赞 赏 P paradiseunderthesunGuest 0$(VIP ) 2012-05-06#11 回复: 世界日报：C38不影响诉讼，可控诉C38违宪！Facebook上用google翻译的此报道： Leahy that the C-38 does not affect existing litigation. (Figure: respondents)Federal Immigration Department announced that more than 280,000 before the 2008 federalskilled worker backlog of cases, set aside a sum of all canceled, the source of law is inthe C-38, this year's Federal Budget Act (the relevant announcement in the Federal Budget,all applications fee returned and released out), the bill now being considered by Congressto review, is expected to read the first time next week, once the clearance can beimplemented, the bill express revocation of the applicant shall not have recourse to theGovernment or seek compensation.However, on behalf of the 750 Federal Skilled Worker past cases of the applicant's lawyerto sue the Department of Immigration Leahy by Tim Leahy, said that even if the revocationof the backlog of C-38 bill was passed, it will not affect existing litigation. Hestressed that the claim against the applicant in the bill, but his client did not claim,but to request to continue the trial, and the bill is highly controversial, that there maybe unconstitutional.An interview, Leahy stressed that the legal "recourse" or "claim" is based on the damage(damage), but he mentioned the lawsuit did not claim damages, but requires the Departmentof Immigration to continue hearing the application of the party case.Look forward to the Third Reading before the rulingIn addition, the C-38 third reading will be some time, but late last month to the court amotion requires the preservation of his client application for temporary exemptionrevoked, until the end of the proceedings and then do be decided, the court ruled in thenear future.He said these skilled migration applicant's request is reasonable, if their immigrationapplication for the proceedings before the award is revoked, the future once the lawsuitin favor of the court order the Department of Immigration continue to hear, and will facethe dilemma of no case to trial.Leahy refers to his client from India, about 300 people; 200 followed by Iran, while Chinais more than 50 people. He believed that if the court's application of these partiesagreed to exempt from avoidance lawsuit prior to trial in early June, there should be morepeople to join.He said the lawsuit as race and congressional legislation, he wants the court to catch upin the C-38 Third Reading of Bills before the ruling, and to avoid unnecessary disputes.When asked Congress to pass legislation to limit the applicant claims the right toconstitutionality, Leahy that the practice of the Department of Immigration does have tobe discussed, if not made during the parliamentary debate on the amendments, after thepassage of the bill would have difficulty to avoid the Constitution lawsuit challenges.Although the Conservative Party can rely on its majority status to forcibly pass the bill,but he hopes that the Conservative members of Congress are aware of the situation andgravity of and the possible consequences of, rather than listen to the immigrationminister, Connie, Jason Kenney, exaggerated and misleading one-sided words, and takeadvantage of the opportunities for bill review, the relevant provisions of the amended ordeleted.Read more: World News Network - North America Chinese Community News - the associatedBangti C 38 "does not affect litigation

评论
回复: 世界日报：C38不影响诉讼，可控诉C38违宪！这是这几天看到的最好消息。本来就纳闷，这么明显的独裁性质的条款怎么就能提出来了呢？点击展开...

评论
回复: 世界日报：C38不影响诉讼，可控诉C38违宪！很好的律师。建议大家把信息多传到印度网站上， 让印度团多鼎力相助。点击展开... 印度人在密切关注这些信息，他们用google翻译迅速看懂了这些新闻，也受到鼓舞

评论
回复: 世界日报采访Tim Leahy表示：C38不影响诉讼，可控诉C38违宪！顶

  ·生活百科 房屋风力发电。
·生活百科 间隔计与智能计