加拿大华人论坛 加拿大留学移民细则，各类都清楚的说明了。

在加拿大

北京，加速吧！！！-----------------------------------http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/resources/manuals/bulletins/2012/ob442.aspOperational Bulletin 442 - June 29, 2012Cessation of Processing and Return of Fees for Certain Federal Skilled Worker ApplicationsSummaryProcessing of certain applications made under the Federal Skilled Worker (FSW) program prior to February 27, 2008, is to cease effective June 29, 2012, and fees paid to Citizenship and Immigration Canada (CIC) in respect of the affected applications are to be returned to the person who paid them as required by law.IssueThis Operational Bulletin (OB) provides guidance on steps to be taken to terminate certain FSW applications made prior to February 27, 2008, as per amendments to the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act (IRPA) that were enacted as part of the Jobs, Growth and Long-term Prosperity Act and come into force on June 29, 2012.BackgroundThe Jobs, Growth and Long-term Prosperity Act eliminates the majority of the backlog in the FSW program by terminating applications and returning fees paid to CIC by certain FSW applicants who applied prior to February 27, 2008. The requirement to terminate certain FSW applications takes legal effect upon the coming into force of relevant provisions of the Jobs, Growth and Long-term Prosperity Act on June 29, 2012.An application by a foreign national for a permanent resident visa as a member of the prescribed class of federal skilled workers that was made before February 27, 2008, is terminated if, before March 29, 2012, it has not been established by an officer, in accordance with the regulations, whether the applicant meets the selection criteria and other requirements applicable to that class.Processing InstructionsVisa offices are to cease processing of FSW applications made prior to February 27, 2008, in accordance with the following instructions:If the officer…andThen…has not established whether the applicant meets the selection criteria prior to March 29, 2012 the application is terminated; andfees paid to CIC are to be returned to the person who paid them.has established whether the applicant meets the selection criteria prior to March 29, 2012the application has not been finalized before June 29, 2012…processing of the application continues to a final decision; andfees paid to CIC will not be returned to the person who paid them.established whether the applicant meets the selection criteria on or after March 29, 2012the application has not been finalized before June 29, 2012…the application is terminated; andfees paid to CIC are to be returned to the person who paid them.established whether the applicant meets the selection criteria on or after March 29, 2012the application has been finalized before June 29, 2012…the final decision on the application stands;processing continues to visa issuance or refusal; andfees paid to CIC will not be returned to the person who paid them.Note: No further action is required at this time on the part of visa offices for those applications that are terminated in accordance with the above instructions.Establishing that a decision has been made as to whether the applicant meets selection criteriaA decision as to whether the applicant meets selection criteria was made if, prior to March 29, 2012, at least one of the following actions was taken:a selection decision was entered into the processing system (“SELDEC” in the Computer-Assisted Immigration Processing System (CAIPS) or “Eligibility ? Passed” / “Eligibility ? Failed” in the Global Case Management System (GCMS));the file notes clearly state that the selection criteria have or have not been met, but a selection decision has not yet been entered into the processing system;a negative decision had previously been made, but the file had been re-opened for a redetermination further to an order by a Superior Court (which includes the Federal Court) or a settlement agreement entered into by way of a Court order made prior to March 29, 2012.A decision as to whether the applicant met selection criteria was not made prior to March 29, 2012, if any of the following situations applied as of that date:a preliminary review of the documentation has taken place, but a selection decision has not been entered into the processing system or documented as described above;additional documentation had been requested from the applicant but has not been received, or a selection interview is pending;additional documents were received that could have served to make a selection decision, but the selection decision has not been entered in the processing system or documented as described above. For instance, receipt of an Arranged Employment Opinion (AEO) or a response to an officer’s request for additional information prior to March 29, 2012.Establishing that a final decision has been madeIn establishing that final decision has been made on an application, at least one of the following actions must have been taken:a final decision was entered into the processing system (“FINDEC” in the Computer-Assisted Immigration Processing System (CAIPS) or “Final ? Approved” / “Final ? Refused” in the Global Case Management System (GCMS));the file notes clearly state that a final decision has been rendered, but the decision has not yet been entered into the processing system.Returning fees paid to CICThe. process of returning fees paid to CIC in concert with the termination of affected applications will be centralized at NHQ ? Finance in consultation with visa offices as required. Fee returns and communications with affected applicants will be initiated by CIC in due course.The basis for the amounts to be refunded will be the POS+ data at missions. NHQ ? Finance will communicate with affected missions in due course to provide further instructions on the extraction of required data. The POS+ data will subsequently be matched with the eligible cases extracted from CAIPS/GCMS and will form the baseline data for the purpose of returning fees to the payee.NHQ ? Finance will communicate with eligible applicants in due course to confirm contact and payee information prior to initiating any return of fees paid to CIC, and will allow a reasonable period of time for applicants to respond. In cases where no response to any initial and any follow-up communications is received, applications are still terminated, but action may still be taken at a future date to return fees to the person who paid them.Fee returns will be issued in the appropriate currency for the country in which the person who paid them resides, using the daily exchange conversion rate in effect on the date of issuance.Unsuccessful applicants who had paid the Right of Permanent Residence Fee (RPRF) will continue to be entitled to a return of that fee in accordance with existing procedures.File retentionThe files and supporting documentation associated with terminated applications will be retained for a period of at least two years from the last point of administrative use, in accordance with current information management practices and retention requirements.The last point of administrative use will generally be considered to be the date on which fees paid to CIC are returned to the applicant.Federal Court challenge to section 87.4 of IRPAThe amendments contained in section 87.4 of the IRPA terminating FSW applications are subject to litigation. The result of that litigation could affect how the terminated FSW applications are handled in the future. Further information will be provided as the litigation progresses.

评论
... 超赞 赏 voiletflower 0$(VIP 0) 2,4582012-06-30#2 回复: 细则，各类都清楚的说明了。可以开帖吼me了！

评论
FN:2007-07-20；S2:2009-07-07；妥投：2009-09-03；变6：2009-11-03；变12：2010-03-03；再次变6：2010-05-25；变12：2010-07-14；ME到，2012-11-28（最好的生日礼物）；DM：2013-2-13；2013-2-23，大信封到。 超赞 赏 加拿大我来了 0$(VIP 0) 5012012-06-30#3 回复: 细则，各类都清楚的说明了。北京VO们，你们什么时候给我们体检表？

评论
北京2007.8.29FN，08.12.6考雅思，7，6.5，6.5，6。2009.8.21S2，2009.10.25递料，2009.10.29变12，2009.12.2变6，2010.2.8变12，2011.7.5日地址栏第一次消失，7月23日地址栏恢复。参加TIM的诉讼了,2012-8-31ME 超赞 赏 L lucky2009 0$(VIP 0) 172012-06-30#4 回复: 细则，各类都清楚的说明了。吼ME!

评论
回复: 细则，各类都清楚的说明了。没说清楚的是 我们这批91的怎么办，都赶进Pool还是跟227/626/71按比例赶进Pool。

评论
喜欢多伦多，中西合璧，享受两种生活。 超赞 赏 W wjfwjf 0$(VIP 0) 3922012-06-30#6 回复: 细则，各类都清楚的说明了。有人说对待一刀切后幸存者，已经Me了的继续处理，否则全赶进池子。

评论
喜欢多伦多，中西合璧，享受两种生活。有人说对待一刀切后幸存者，已经Me了的继续处理，否则全赶进池子。点击展开...应该不会。北京很快结案。之前91就不受追溯影响。

评论
回复: 细则，各类都清楚的说明了。池子应该是针对c50的，如果打分了，安心等me吧！

评论
FN:2007-07-20；S2:2009-07-07；妥投：2009-09-03；变6：2009-11-03；变12：2010-03-03；再次变6：2010-05-25；变12：2010-07-14；ME到，2012-11-28（最好的生日礼物）；DM：2013-2-13；2013-2-23，大信封到。 超赞 赏 Brouklin 0$(VIP 0) 4462012-06-30#9 回复: 细则，各类都清楚的说明了。关注一下，顶一顶，

评论
Fn：2007-9-26 BJ, S2：2009-9-25 ，2012-11-29 me, Dm，2013 1103， 超赞 赏 C cgyy 0$(VIP 0) 1392012-06-30#10 回复: 细则，各类都清楚的说明了。ME应该就在不远的前方

评论
回复: 细则，各类都清楚的说明了。应该不会。北京很快结案。之前91就不受追溯影响。点击展开... 我又想了一下，应该不会没有Me，否则使馆合作体检单位半年到一年都没事干了，不符合“可持续发展”的原则。

评论
喜欢多伦多，中西合璧，享受两种生活。 超赞 赏 U under_same_sky 0$(VIP 0) 962012-06-30#12 回复: 细则，各类都清楚的说明了。我想对我们北京91的已经说得很清楚了：条件：If the officer has established whether the applicant meets the selection criteria prior to March 29, 2012 and the application has not been finalized before June 29, 2012…（所有北京91的都已经S2了，但还没有finalized） 行动：processing of the application continues to a final decision; and（先发ME，才能到final decision）fees paid to CIC will not be returned to the person who paid them. 所以，我认为可以吼ME了。

评论
回复: 细则，各类都清楚的说明了。"processing of the application continues to a final decision", 我怕过几个月等新规则出来，"final decision" 就变成 "放进池子" ，而不是发Visa。纯属猜测，被Kenny折腾怕了。

评论
喜欢多伦多，中西合璧，享受两种生活。 超赞 赏 M monk620 0$(VIP 0) 4542012-06-30#14 回复: 细则，各类都清楚的说明了。似乎比较明确了。后边就看北京啥时开动了。这段时间我是真有点焦虑了

评论
2007-11 FN\2009-08-22 烤鸭（笔试）\2009-08-24 烤鸭（口试）\2009-09-04 L5.5 R7 W5 S5 总成绩5.5\2009-11-27 中介通知补料\2010-01-14 中介快递材料到使馆\2012-05 caips 70分 正面评价\2012-12-20ME、31日体检\2013-4-16 DM \2013-4-27 毕业 VO: SAW 学期：65个月我想对我们北京91的已经说得很清楚了：条件：If the officer has established whether the applicant meets the selection criteria prior to March 29, 2012 and the application has not been finalized before June 29, 2012…（所有北京91的都已经S2了，但还没有finalized） 所以，我认为可以吼ME了。点击展开...那你的意思是说北京91的一个都不切了？这和肯尼的初衷不符啊

评论
回复: 细则，各类都清楚的说明了。只有3.29前打过分且SELDEC=1或4的不被切，北京10年3月中旬前补料的基本上都安全

评论
FN：2007-11-15S2：2009-11-2012：2010-3-6ME：2012-11-28 超赞 赏 P playaroundtoCanada 0$(VIP 0) 8592012-06-30#17 回复: 细则，各类都清楚的说明了。谢谢楼主的资讯，说得很清楚了。

评论
六年等待后，终于获得重生。2012年11月1日登陆爱城，在这里，我开始我的第二人生~！只有3.29前打过分且SEL=1或4的不被切，北京09年3月中旬前补料的基本上都安全点击展开... CIC这次好像留了个活口，以下的条件或许适合北京3月中旬以后补料的人，我认为北京使馆可以用这个“救”所有的北京91，如果他们比较仁慈的话： a preliminary review of the documentation has taken place, but a selection decision has not been entered into the processing system or documented as described above;

评论
回复: 细则，各类都清楚的说明了。因为在等IELTS 成绩, S2还没有寄出. 按这个Bulletin 就要被退案了, 同样情况的同学我们一起上诉吧.

评论
回复: 细则，各类都清楚的说明了。CIC这次好像留了个活口，以下的条件或许适合北京3月中旬以后补料的人，我认为北京使馆可以用这个“救”所有的北京91，如果他们比较仁慈的话：希望如此，但是。。。A decision as to whether the applicant met selection criteria was not made prior to March 29, 2012, if any of the following situations applied as of that date: a preliminary review of the documentation has taken place, but a selection decision has not been entered into the processing system or documented as described above;点击展开...

  ·中文新闻 迈尔圣诞活动被取消后，尽管越来越多的人呼吁在维多利亚州建
·中文新闻 昆士兰州警官据称在班达伯格肇事逃逸中被偷来的汽车撞倒，青