加拿大华人论坛 加拿大留学移民申请人的诉讼僵局



在加拿大


Would-be newcomers caught in legal quagmire By Tobi Cohen, Postmedia News July 13, 2012 A group of would-be immigrants, who successfully sued the government over processing delays, will soon learn whether the bulk of them will remain out of luck in terms of their quest to come to Canada thanks to a new law that allows Citizenship and Immigration to toss out more than a quarter-of-a-million old applications.OTTAWA A group of would-be immigrants, who successfully sued the government over processing delays, will soon learn whether the bulk of them will remain out of luck in terms of their quest to come to Canada thanks to a new law that allows Citizenship and Immigration to toss out more than a quarter-of-a-million old applications.The Federal Court ruled last month, just two weeks before Bill C-38 became law, that the government must process all the applications it takes into the system and that the delays, some going back nine years, were unjustified.The court ordered the government to finalize the lead litigant's case by Oct. 14.While the court didn't issue separate rulings for each of the 900 litigants involved, their lawyer Tim Leahy said an agreement was struck with the government in February to apply the principles in the lead case to the others.But that was before Bill C-38 and in a document filed in Federal Court this week, the government argued the new law eliminating some 280,000 unassessed federal skilled worker applications received prior to February 27, 2008 and refunding their $130 million in application fees trumps their agreement."The applications of approximately 635 of the applicants involved in this proceeding were terminated by operation of law," the government argued. "The minister is bound by the law of Canada and has no discretion to process these terminated applications contrary to the law."As for the litigants who are not among the 280,000 including those who received a positive assessment before March 29 government lawyers said they would present a proposal for processing those applications by July 16.Leahy, however, argued his clients had a "vested right" to have their files processed according to the February agreement and that "the discretion is there" for Minister Jason Kenney to "behave honourably."Political ambition and ego impede the honourable administration of the law," he argued, noting the new law doesn't prevent the government from assigning new file numbers to his clients' cases and finalizing them, nor does it nullify the February agreement.Leahy further argued that more than two dozen of his clients were doubly penalized since they were instructed after the March 29 deadline to take costly medical exams, submit photographs and pay a head tax even though the government was planning to cancel their applications.Leahy said Justice Robert Barnes must ultimately decide whether to order Citizenship and Immigration to honour the agreement and process all the files, including those impacted by Bill C-38. He could also order each case to be heard separately, Leahy said, or simply "wash his hands of the matter" and suggest the litigants get involved in a class action lawsuit that's already in the works.While Leahy isn't currently involved, a handful of lawyers representing about 700 other applicants are in the process of preparing their case.Lorne Waldman, an immigration lawyer involved in the pending suit, said the constitutional argument they will put forward will be that C-38 ought to be "struck down" because it denies applicants "due process.""These applicants applied in good faith, some as long as seven years ago. They paid their fees and were told that their applications would be processed," he said."We are arguing that is it is inconsistent with our Charter and Bill of RIghts to take away the right to apply to come to Canada in this fashion."The lawyers involved in the class action negotiated a 90-day reprieve with the federal government just before the bill received Royal Assent on June 29. The deal effectively prevents the government from destroying the files before the lawyers file their case in Federal Court.It should be noted that a favourable ruling for Leahy's litigants would have no bearing on the thousand of other applicants impacted by Bill C-38.

评论
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]他们欺瞒上帝偷偷拨回时间They fool God secretly timing of the reversal 超赞 赏 lcx1018 0$(VIP 0) 812012-07-15#2 回复: 申请人的诉讼僵局本届加拿大政府和CIC粗暴地废除排队等待长达6~8年的28万移民申请积案的做法是无耻地践踏人类文明史上契约精神的行径,将永远被人类世世代代的文明社会所唾弃和谴责。作恶一朝,遗臭万年!

  ·中文新闻 2024 年 HSC 成绩:北悉尼男子高中连续排名第一
·中文新闻 2024 年 HSC 成绩:新南威尔士州顶尖学校排名

加拿大留学移民-加拿大

漂亮国旅签小贴士

华人网漂亮国旅签免面试签政策一直都有,只是这一尝试等了十年,漂亮国政策都在网上,只要你按照他的步奏准备,没有什么困难的,不要去猜测,更不要吓唬自己,以讹传讹。自己什么情 ...

加拿大留学移民-加拿大

中美双籍移民加拿大。

华人网全家两套护照,两套名字,应该用哪个国籍申请加国移民签比较合适?考虑到税收,移民监,改名,签证批准率等问题的话?另,枫叶卡上的国籍是否可以改? 评论 加州甜橙 说:全家两 ...

加拿大留学移民-加拿大

双护照香港转机的朋友们

华人网入境中国难道只看中国护照吗?多年前从加直达国内边境还要看护照+枫叶卡。如此推论从香港入境,是不是也类似需要中国护照+通行证?加之中国护照乃加国领馆颁发,从香港入境无枫 ...

加拿大留学移民-加拿大

双护照从海南走可不可行?

华人网59个国家人员持普通护照赴海南旅游,可从海南对外开放口岸免办签证入境,在海南省行政区域内停留30天。如果用加拿大护照去海南,然后用身份证入中国大陆,回来再从海南走。这可 ...