加拿大华人论坛 加拿大留学移民430香港抗议照片再现英文媒体Canada.com，报道的内容是Tim组诉讼，继续曝光CIC背信弃义

在加拿大

http://o.canada.com/2012/07/14/would-be-newcomers-caught-in-legal-quagmire-2/

评论
回复: 430香港抗议照片再现英文媒体Canada.com，报道的内容是Tim组诉讼Would-be newcomers caught in legal quagmire OTTAWA A group of would-be immigrants, who successfully sued the government over processing delays, will soon learn whether the bulk of them will remain out of luck in terms of their quest to come to Canada thanks to a new law that allows Citizenship and Immigration to toss out more than a quarter-of-a-million old applications. The Federal Court ruled last month, just two weeks before Bill C-38 became law, that the government must process all the applications it takes into the system and that the delays, some going back nine years, were unjustified.The court ordered the government to finalize the lead litigant’s case by Oct. 14. While the court didn’t issue separate rulings for each of the 900 litigants involved, their lawyer Tim Leahy said an agreement was struck with the government in February to apply the principles in the lead case to the others. But that was before Bill C-38 and in a document filed in Federal Court this week, the government argued the new law eliminating some 280,000 unassessed federal skilled worker applications received prior to February 27, 2008 and refunding their $130 million in application fees trumps their agreement. “The applications of approximately 635 of the applicants involved in this proceeding were terminated by operation of law,” the government argued. “The minister is bound by the law of Canada and has no discretion to process these terminated applications contrary to the law.” As for the litigants who are not among the 280,000 including those who received a positive assessment before March 29 government lawyers said they would present a proposal for processing those applications by July 16. Leahy, however, argued his clients had a “vested right” to have their files processed according to the February agreement and that “the discretion is there” for Minister Jason Kenney to “behave honourably. “Political ambition and ego impede the honourable administration of the law,” he argued, noting the new law doesn’t prevent the government from assigning new file numbers to his clients’ cases and finalizing them, nor does it nullify the February agreement.Leahy further argued that more than two dozen of his clients were doubly penalized since they were instructed after the March 29 deadline to take costly medical exams, submit photographs and pay a head tax even though the government was planning to cancel their applications. Leahy said Justice Robert Barnes must ultimately decide whether to order Citizenship and Immigration to honour the agreement and process all the files, including those impacted by Bill C-38. He could also order each case to be heard separately, Leahy said, or simply “wash his hands of the matter” and suggest the litigants get involved in a class action lawsuit that’s already in the works.While Leahy isn’t currently involved, a handful of lawyers representing about 700 other applicants are in the process of preparing their case. Lorne Waldman, an immigration lawyer involved in the pending suit, said the constitutional argument they will put forward will be that C-38 ought to be “struck down” because it denies applicants “due process.”“These applicants applied in good faith, some as long as seven years ago. They paid their fees and were told that their applications would be processed,” he said. “We are arguing that is it is inconsistent with our Charter and Bill of Rights to take away the right to apply to come to Canada in this fashion.” The lawyers involved in the class action negotiated a 90-day reprieve with the federal government just before the bill received Royal Assent on June 29. The deal effectively prevents the government from destroying the files before the lawyers file their case in Federal Court. It should be noted that a favourable ruling for Leahy’s litigants would have no bearing on the thousand of other applicants impacted by Bill C-38.

评论
回复: 430香港抗议照片再现英文媒体Canada.com，报道的内容是Tim组诉讼，继续曝光CIC背信弃义很好,期待你说的下一步行动。

评论
回复: 430香港抗议照片再现英文媒体Canada.com，报道的内容是Tim组诉讼，继续曝光CIC背信弃义非常好的时机，非常有力量的报道。。。

评论
网络暴力和现实中一样无处不在，远离不诚信的人，管它老乡，同胞，还是网络名人！！！ 超赞 赏 J jesuismajeur 0$(VIP 0) 2502012-07-15#5 回复: 430香港抗议照片再现英文媒体Canada.com，报道的内容是Tim组诉讼，继续曝光CIC背信弃义430的报道从4月20几号到现在都没停止 星岛日报半个月后再炒作，也不怕炒冷饭

评论
回复: 430香港抗议照片再现英文媒体Canada.com，报道的内容是Tim组诉讼，继续曝光CIC背信弃义谎言一传再传都几乎成了所谓的事实，这个正义还怕一传再传么。。。只要有声音，就有希望，哪怕是同一种声音，也是力量所聚希望所在。。。

评论
网络暴力和现实中一样无处不在，远离不诚信的人，管它老乡，同胞，还是网络名人！！！ 超赞 赏 J jesuismajeur 0$(VIP 0) 2502012-07-15#7 感到法语媒体在向我招手啦。 如果我能用法语自由表达，魁北克的媒体早就被征服了 难怪马克思说了什么，外语就是战斗的武器，原话语气好像更强。

评论
回复: 430香港抗议照片再现英文媒体Canada.com，报道的内容是Tim组诉讼，继续曝光CIC背信弃义Thanks!!! Reports in English media are key to influence judge's decision.

评论
回复: 430香港抗议照片再现英文媒体Canada.com，报道的内容是Tim组诉讼，继续曝光CIC背信弃义

评论
2006年11月雅思（读7、说7、听6.5、写6）2006年12月1日递香港，2007年5月18日FN2008年10月生宝宝，未补材料2008年12月22日做清华认证VO是SKM,自评67分。等S2 。。。 超赞 赏 coolwangd 0$(VIP 0) 1832012-07-15#10 回复: 430香港抗议照片再现英文媒体Canada.com，报道的内容是Tim组诉讼，继续曝光CIC背信弃义顶帖没商量！

评论
2007 02 06 FN；2012 02 13 S2；2012 05 16 香港签收；2012 06 14 曼谷体检；2012 06 19 寄出汇票；2012 06 21 香港签收；2012 06 22 汇票解付/收据；2012 06 29 恶法通过，遂与其搏斗。。。 超赞 赏 B-a-King 0$(VIP 0) 10,5202012-07-15#11 回复: 430香港抗议照片再现英文媒体Canada.com，报道的内容是Tim组诉讼，继续曝光CIC背信弃义这是什么网？在加拿大从来没有听说过！

评论
Eat well, don't smoke, and a fuck was equal to a five-mile walk-----Elizabeth Jane Howard 超赞 赏 温 温哥华居民 0$(VIP 0) 9302012-07-15#12 回复: 430香港抗议照片再现英文媒体Canada.com，报道的内容是Tim组诉讼，继续曝光CIC背信弃义总趴在中文网站挖大陆负面新闻的，怎么会知道加拿大主流英文各个网站

评论
回复: 430香港抗议照片再现英文媒体Canada.com，报道的内容是Tim组诉讼，继续曝光CIC背信弃义Canada.com网属于Postmedia集团 该集团的媒体有：Ottawa Citizen，Montreal Gazette等等。 该记者是专门报道移民新闻的，负责postmedia集团的移民专栏

评论
回复: 430香港抗议照片再现英文媒体Canada.com，报道的内容是Tim组诉讼，继续曝光CIC背信弃义这篇报道实际上是转自Ottawa Citizen: http://www.ottawacitizen.com/news/Would+newcomers+caught+legal+quagmire/6931480/story.html 只不过把图片换成了430香港抗议的。

评论
回复: 430香港抗议照片再现英文媒体Canada.com，报道的内容是Tim组诉讼，继续曝光CIC背信弃义顶

评论
卡屯集结号(137990988)Calgary Badminton Group (168454634) 超赞 赏 S snowolf2008 0$(VIP 0) 3162012-07-15#16 回复: 430香港抗议照片再现英文媒体Canada.com，报道的内容是Tim组诉讼，继续曝光CIC背信弃义顶 及时雨

评论
回复: 430香港抗议照片再现英文媒体Canada.com，报道的内容是Tim组诉讼，继续曝光CIC背信弃义这是什么网？在加拿大从来没有听说过！点击展开...在网上找得，其实多看看英文媒体，挺好的。The Ottawa Citizen is an English-language daily newspaper owned by Postmedia Network in Ottawa, Canada. According to the Canadian Newspaper Association, the paper had a 2008 weekly circulation of 900,197. （看得人还是不少的嘛，尤其在这个人少的可怜的国家）Established as The Bytown Packet in 1845 by William Harris, it was renamed the Citizen in 1851. The editorial view of the Citizen has varied with its ownership, taking a reform, anti-Tory position under Harris and a conservative position under Bell. Under the Southams, it moved to the left, supporting the Liberals largely in opposition to the Progressive Conservative Party's support of free trade in the late 1980s. Under Black, it moved to the right and became a supporter of the Reform Party. It endorsed the Conservative Party of Canada in the 2006 federal election. （还是支持保守党的媒体哦）In 2004 CBC reported that CanWest which owns the Citizen had changed the wording of Associated Press stories. The words 'insurgent' and 'militant' which were originally used in the AP story were swapped for 'terrorist'. The rest of the story stayed the same. This led to the National Council on Canadian-Arab relations to accuse the Citizen of being pro-Israel and anti-muslim. （有点美国共和党思路的意思）

  ·中文新闻 2024 年美国大选结果：特朗普获胜可能会让澳大利亚经济损失
·中文新闻 2024 年美国大选结果：特朗普是新的罗纳德·里根 - 没有美德