加拿大华人论坛 温哥华 VancouverBC自由党筹款委员会主席是位地产大亨

在加拿大

首先作为华人应该承认炒房行为确实扰乱了正常市场秩序，造成了普通居民无法负担高房价这样严重的社会问题，所以必须督促政府制定政策增加税收打击炒房。但制定政策必须针对炒房行为而不是特定族群。针对海外资金炒房的问题，也必须制定政策加以管理和限制，非公民非永久居民原则上禁止买房，即便可以买也要付更高的交易税，地税，增值税税率，以保证本地居民的优先权。同样，政策必须针对海外资金而不是特定族群。

评论
BC地产大鳄，著名的“康斗王”（Condo King）Bob Rennie 是BC自由党筹款委员会的主席。http://thetyee.ca/News/2016/05/02/Clark-Donors-Tied-Real-Estate/

评论
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bob_Rennie炒房发家致富， 地产大亨19岁就知道卖房子发财Bob Rennie was born in 1956 and raised in East Vancouver on East 5th. His mother was a homemaker and waitress, and his father a truck driver for Carling Brewery. Rennie started selling East Side homes at the age of 19. He began selling condos in Vancouver in 1990 with Dan Ulinder, forming Ulinder Rennie Project Marketing. In 1997 Rennie bought out Ulinder and established Rennie Marketing Systems.[3]

评论
天生灵物在尘间，柔声律足若女仙。 星眸炯炯残更守，腰细软软树上窜。 痴念鱼香总断魂，见得鼠影扑向前。 玉女怀中身儿卧，须眉心里醋海翻。冰屋朱扉曉未開，誰將金策扣瓊台。碧花紅尾小仙犬，閑吠五雲嗔客來。兔魄呈祥冰彩烂，广寒宫里逢华旦。兔魄初生人初度，期共婵娟长久。 超赞 赏 反馈:waren 和 传国玉玺 sabre 174$(VIP 0,#15) 85,0652016-05-18#4 2016年， 第一神贴， 敦促政府加税， 掀起建设社会主义新高潮，

评论
geomarb 说:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bob_Rennie炒房发家致富， 地产大亨19岁就知道卖房子发财Bob Rennie was born in 1956 and raised in East Vancouver on East 5th. His mother was a homemaker and waitress, and his father a truck driver for Carling Brewery. Rennie started selling East Side homes at the age of 19. He began selling condos in Vancouver in 1990 with Dan Ulinder, forming Ulinder Rennie Project Marketing. In 1997 Rennie bought out Ulinder and established Rennie Marketing Systems.[3]点击展开...这样的人负责为BC自由党筹款，难怪政府这手打不下去啊。

评论
sabre 说:2016年， 第一神贴，敦促政府加税， 掀起建设社会主义新高潮，点击展开...呵呵，今年以来敦促政府开征“炒房税”的多了，记得的就有NDP，CIBC。我从去年就主张收炒房税。你的歪理还真不少，要求政府制定政策限制炒房在你眼里也是不该。老百姓要求政府采取措施是社会成熟的标志，因为政府有立法权（当然要经国会批准），要求政府解决实际上是寻求和平，理性，法律的解决途径。实际上还有其他途径，但通常免不了暴力，血腥，在健全的法制社会形成之前，大概那种途径更多，规则也简单，就看哪方人多，力量强。炒房犯众怒，但所有人都在试图循着和平，理性，法律的途径来解决，这是社会之福，我辈之福。政府的一个重要职责就是监管市场，监管行业，监管企业，监管经济发展。Health Canada是干嘛的？监管食品药品行业的：CRTC是干嘛的？监管通信行业的；Ministry of Natural Resources是干嘛的？监管能源行业的；Competition Bureau是干嘛的？监管市场公平竞争的。。。。。。各行各业都有监管，你梦想的完全不受政府监管的所谓“自由市场经济”，就是个传说。

评论
民主、公平、自由、科学、信仰、上帝、……哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈!

评论
绿阴幽草胜花时楼主有房吗？几个？点击展开...你管得着吗？

评论
waren 说:民主、公平、自由、科学、信仰、上帝、……哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈!点击展开...都是面具。

评论
Horse Dragoon 说:楼主有房吗？几个？点击展开...我有四个， 两个心房， 两个乳房，

评论
Horse Dragoon 说:你连回答都是国内的模式， 谁要管你？好奇你每天发房子的帖子， 好像房价把你害惨了， 在这里大发苦水。房子是若了你还是招了你？。。。。。搞得你好像是国会议员似的又是要监管又是要加税又是不让外国人买房又是打击炒房，，，，累不累呀？ 你恨房子吗? 你恨别人买房吗？ 你恨别人有房子吗？ 恨别人有多个房子吗？你操这些心要干嘛呢？？？？点击展开...好奇害死猫，看看你自己的头像，哈哈！你们这些人都喜欢偷换概念，把正常买房和炒房混为一谈，混淆视听。买房，是正常的生活需要；正因为房子不是普通商品，而是关系到万万千千普通百姓的生存基本需要，所以炒作房市，推高房价，让老百姓负担不起住房，扰乱社会稳定，并且广大华人因为极少数同胞自私自利的炒房行为而被无辜指责为自私贪婪的一群。炒房在加拿大已经激起民愤，犯了众怒，成了过街老鼠人人喊打，制定政策打击炒房是迟早的事，不信就等着瞧吧。

评论
How Vancouver’s runaway real estate became a national problemhttp://www.canadianbusiness.com/eco...unaway-real-estate-became-a-national-problem/Vancouver’s flirtation with irrational housing exuberance has become one of the bigger stories of 2016. In February The New Yorker profiled the super-rich kids of the Chinese billionaires and millionaires who are either partially, mostly or wholly responsible for driving the price of an average home in Canada’s third-biggest metropolitan area to more than $1 million. A month later, The Walrus published an article that focused on the perverse effects of surging home prices and stagnant median incomes. Maclean’s this month delivered perhaps the most definitive account of the situation to date, taking the time to explain that Vancouver real-estate prices are subject to forces that go beyond supply, demand and gorgeous views.http://www.canadianbusiness.com/economy/how-a-flipping-tax-might-calm-canadas-bubbly-housing-market/Last week, Benjamin Tal, an oft-cited economist at Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce, kept things going with a note on what could be done to restrain international demand. Tal has put more effort into studying Canada’s housing market than many of his counterparts on Bay Street. In recent years he has explained thoughtfully why Canada’s real-estate boom is different than what occurred in the United States in the years ahead of the financial crisis. Anyone who took his advice and ignored the boomlet in bets on a Great North housing bust is better off for listening. Canadian real-estate prices are being driven by local conditions, making a national calamity of the type that afflicted the U.S. highly unlikely.So now Tal is digging into those local conditions. His note last week was a reminder that plenty of cities have become a diversification play for extraordinarily rich Asians. (The New Yorker could just as easily have profiled the super-rich Chinese kids of Sydney or London or Los Angeles.) What is unique about Vancouver’s real-estate bubble is the unwillingness of the authorities to do anything about it. Governments in Australia, New Zealand and the United Kingdom all are trying to slow the rush of international capital into local housing markets. Since last year, the only way a non-Australian can own a home in Australia is to redevelop an existing property or build a new one; the individual must also promise the home will be for personal use. New Zealand and the U.K. have both introduced new taxes on capital gains from property.Tal wrote that at the very least Vancouver (and possibly Toronto) could tax “flipping” by international buyers. “We don’t know how big it is, but we know it’s not constructive,” Tal said of what amounts to speculation. “Applying a flipping tax on foreign investors might be a step in the right direction. It won’t solve the problem, but it might be an effective way to remove the most problematic element of foreign investment in Canadian real estate.”http://www.canadianbusiness.com/inv...s-are-dangerously-overexposed-on-real-estate/The remarkable thing about all the reporting and analysis of the Vancouver housing market this year is its consistency. Everyone comments on how authorities such as Canada Mortgage and Housing Corp. only now are starting to gather data on the extent to which international buyers are responsible for the price escalatio—an inexcusable example of bureaucratic inertia and old-fashioned Canadian complacency. Writers and commentators present entirely logical arguments for why a tax or a regulation aimed at levelling the playing field between regular homebuyers and the world’s ultra-rich would be an entirely reasonable response to what clearly is an unusual situation. The reports also dutifully present the self-serving counterpoints of real-estate agents and contractors, who say restrictions would cause the market to buckle, unfairly hurting seniors who are counting on the value of their homes to finance their retirements. Advocates for excessive home prices also point out that construction has become a bigger part of the British Columbia economy, equating any effort to deflate Vancouver’s housing bubble to act of economic sabotage.Missing from the analysis is any mention of the fundamental flaw in Canada’s regulatory system that allows the debate about Vancouver’s housing market to persist without resolution. In 2013, the International Monetary Fund called on Canada to create a federal entity with a clear mandate to monitor threats to the financial system. The IMF earlier this month scolded Ottawa for so far ignoring its advice.The Vancouver house-price surge is exactly the sort of thing the independent agency should handle. It is a national issue: everyone knows who will be called on to clean up the mess if it bursts. The banks would feel it and likely would curb lending. CMHC would feel it because it has insured most of the mortgages Vancouverites have used to buy their inflated assets. The only ones who wouldn’t feel it would be the rich Chinese whose goal simply was to collect assets outside the reach of their government.The term that has been adopted for such oversight is macroprudential regulation. The U.K. takes it so seriously that it invested the Bank of England with the power to deflate any asset-price bubbles that it identifies as threats to the financial system. In Canada, macroprudential policy rests with a group of senior officials in Ottawa called the Senior Advisory Committee. It meets in private and—we’re told—advises the government on what it should do at any given time.http://www.canadianbusiness.com/economy/inside-the-toxic-politics-of-cooling-canadas-housing-market/The government is free to ignore this advice, as former prime minister Stephen Harper apparently did ahead of last year’s election. The recent reporting about Vancouver suggests the pressure on politicians to leave housing market alone is intense. The New Yorker noted that even Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has indicated caution in doing anything that would affect the price of many households’ most valuable asset.This is precisely why an independent macroprudential regulator is so important. Ideally, it would have the power to defuse risks without first having to seek permission from a politician, just as the Bank of Canada sets the benchmark interest rate without input from finance minister. But if that is too much power for governments to yield, then a neutral body could at least identify threats and offer neutral advice on what to do about them. The debate could then take place in Parliament in something closer to real-time, rather than in the pages of magazines after it may already be too late.

评论
Metro Vancouver real estate is like the lottery, says studyProfits for homeowners are 'more like lottery winnings than a reward for hard work' says study's authorhttp://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/metro-vancouver-ccpa-lottery-1.3588159How Vancouver’s runaway real estate became a national problemhttp://www.canadianbusiness.com/eco...unaway-real-estate-became-a-national-problem/B.C.’s house-flipping practices setting off alarm bells in OntarioHouse-flipping concerns as 368 Vancouver homes sold at least twice since 2014Shadow flipping could put Vancouver real estate deals under scrutiny from the taxmanFlipping houses? Expect to face tax on 100% of your profitsBurnaby man's petition asks Canadian government to take action on foreign ownershipHow a house can become a prison after it soars in value House flipping tax could curb speculative foreign money, CIBC saysHow a “flipping tax” might calm Canada’s bubbly housing marketReal estate cheating scandal claims mortgage brokerWhat you need to know about ‘shadow flipping’ in VancouverIt’s time for a ‘flipping tax’ on foreign investorsVancouver Shadow Flipping Shows 'Naked Greed,' Premier SaysThe real estate technique fuelling Vancouver's housing market

评论


评论
传国玉玺 说:好奇害死猫，看看你自己的头像，哈哈！你们这些人都喜欢偷换概念，把正常买房和炒房混为一谈，混淆视听。买房，是正常的生活需要；正因为房子不是普通商品，而是关系到万万千千普通百姓的生存基本需要，所以炒作房市，推高房价，让老百姓负担不起住房，扰乱社会稳定，并且广大华人因为极少数同胞自私自利的炒房行为而被无辜指责为自私贪婪的一群。炒房在加拿大已经激起民愤，犯了众怒，成了过街老鼠人人喊打，制定政策打击炒房是迟早的事，不信就等着瞧吧。点击展开...就好像市场行为是绝对真理似得。北美和房产物业相关的税费都是干嘛用的？澳洲为啥不让那个华人买一亿澳元（美元？）的房子？

  ·房产房屋 如何处理收到议会发来的建筑通知？
·房产房屋 超级无敌哭