加拿大华人论坛 加拿大留学移民北京起诉的同学也没有收到律师最近的3封信吗？快来商量对策啊！

在加拿大

原来康尼可以随便胡作非为是有法律依据的，想要一刀切也不违法，下一步如何通过律师采取行动要商量一下吧，难道就这样放弃？ 强制撤案的法律还有几个月才有可能通过，在没有通过之前一切皆有可能！ 国内的邮箱还有hotmail都被屏蔽收不到他的邮件，我的Inbox邮箱收到 3月2号Good day, Attached is an article from yesterday's Globe & Mail, summarizing an interview with the Minister for Citizenship and Immigration, the Hon. Jason Kenney, P.C., M.P. The Minister stated that he intends to:1. impose a minimum English score for FSW immigrants,2. require "fluency" for some professions,3. reduce the age (to 35) for maximum points for age4. require applicants in licensed occupations have their professional credential approved before they apply and5. create yet another "fast track". The fifth point means that those who applied earlier will be pushed even further back down the queue. Please keep in mind that, although many believe that I won the case in 2002 where I challenged CIC intention to apply the now current selection criteria with a 72-point pass-mark retrospectively, I actually lost on the legal issue but, nevertheless, the Court ordered CIC to make selection decisions on our 102 litigants before the new rule went into effect five weeks later; see below. Thus, CIC may if it chooses apply these new criteria on pending files. I expect to serve and file written arguments in my current mandamus litigation and, in addition to seeking the Court to order CIC to commence processing the 655 litigants files, I am also asking the Court to prohibit CIC from refusing any of them under selection criteria not in force when their applications were received. Regards, Tim 今天 Minister Kenney threatens to refuse all backlogged applicants Good day, Here is a link to an article, summarising the speech the Minister for Citizenship and Immigration delivered.http://thechronicleherald.ca/canada/71210-minister-all-options-table-when-it-comes-immigration Next are the comments I gave to a reporter who asked for them. And below them is the entire text of the Minister's speech. In case you wonder whether he has the power to so, here is the text of the amendment to the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act giving rise his queue-jumping policy. It authorizes him to do anything he deems to be "efficient". 87.3 (1) This section applies to applications for visas or other documents made under subsection 11(1), other than those made by persons referred to in subsection 99(2), sponsorship applications made by persons referred to in subsection 13(1), applications for permanent resident status under subsection 21(1) or temporary resident status under subsection 22(1) made by foreign nationals in Canada and to requests under subsection 25(1) made by foreign nationals outside Canada.​ Attainment of immigration goals​ (2) The processing of applications and requests is to be conducted in a manner that, in the opinion of the Minister, will best support the attainment of the immigration goals established by the Government of Canada.​ * * *​ (7) Nothing in this section in any way limits the power of the Minister to otherwise determine the most efficient manner in which to administer this Act.​

评论
自愿参加HK请愿的请到这里报名http://forums.canadameet.me/showthread.php?t=547494 ，时间定在4月30号。请给我悄悄话留下电话。请抓紧时间办好港澳通行证！ 超赞 赏 K ksun_1234 0$(VIP 0) 4642012-03-09#2 回复: 北京起诉的同学也没有收到律师最近的3封信吗？快来商量对策啊！那个只是从加拿大国内来讲可能是合法的，站在一个个人和加拿大政府的立场呢？在那个角度，加拿大政府/CIC是违法的。它愚弄了91的申请者，耽误了我们的时间，错过了移民他国的机会。但是不晓得这个怎么告？估计就不是去加拿大告了，可以去国际法庭么？

评论
FN:2007.11S2:2009.1212:2010.4 超赞 赏 K ksun_1234 0$(VIP 0) 4642012-03-09#3 回复: 北京起诉的同学也没有收到律师最近的3封信吗？快来商量对策啊！懂法的人进来讨论下，如果状告加拿大政府，我一定第一时间参与。。。

评论
FN:2007.11S2:2009.1212:2010.4 超赞 赏 jn凡凡 0$(VIP 0) 3562012-03-09#4 回复: 北京起诉的同学也没有收到律师最近的3封信吗？快来商量对策啊！Remember, Court actions take time but the courts in Canada are independent of the Government and can overrule what the government legislates. Courts are really the peoples' defense from illegal government action and preserve democracy and the rule of law. Canada's courts truly are independent! 我的律师来信谈到的对诉讼的态度

评论
2007.10.1递北京;2009.10.16 S2邮件;2010.1.19日S2补料寄北京。(补充：之前状态5）2010.1.29变12;2010年12月CAIPS无果；2011年7月CAIPS查询74分.2011.11.7地址栏消失了几天。2012.3.10Litigation.原来康尼可以随便胡作非为是有法律依据的，想要一刀切也不违法，下一步如何通过律师采取行动要商量一下吧，难道就这样放弃？ 强制撤案的法律还有几个月才有可能通过，在没有通过之前一切皆有可能！ 国内的邮箱还有hotmail都被屏蔽收不到他的邮件，我的Inbox邮箱收到 3月2号Good day, Attached is an article from yesterday's Globe & Mail, summarizing an interview with the Minister for Citizenship and Immigration, the Hon. Jason Kenney, P.C., M.P. The Minister stated that he intends to:1. impose a minimum English score for FSW immigrants,2. require "fluency" for some professions,3. reduce the age (to 35) for maximum points for age4. require applicants in licensed occupations have their professional credential approved before they apply and5. create yet another "fast track". The fifth point means that those who applied earlier will be pushed even further back down the queue. Please keep in mind that, although many believe that I won the case in 2002 where I challenged CIC intention to apply the now current selection criteria with a 72-point pass-mark retrospectively, I actually lost on the legal issue but, nevertheless, the Court ordered CIC to make selection decisions on our 102 litigants before the new rule went into effect five weeks later; see below. Thus, CIC may if it chooses apply these new criteria on pending files. I expect to serve and file written arguments in my current mandamus litigation and, in addition to seeking the Court to order CIC to commence processing the 655 litigants files, I am also asking the Court to prohibit CIC from refusing any of them under selection criteria not in force when their applications were received. Regards, Tim 今天 Minister Kenney threatens to refuse all backlogged applicants Good day, Here is a link to an article, summarising the speech the Minister for Citizenship and Immigration delivered.http://thechronicleherald.ca/canada/71210-minister-all-options-table-when-it-comes-immigration Next are the comments I gave to a reporter who asked for them. And below them is the entire text of the Minister's speech. In case you wonder whether he has the power to so, here is the text of the amendment to the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act giving rise his queue-jumping policy. It authorizes him to do anything he deems to be "efficient". 87.3 (1) This section applies to applications for visas or other documents made under subsection 11(1), other than those made by persons referred to in subsection 99(2), sponsorship applications made by persons referred to in subsection 13(1), applications for permanent resident status under subsection 21(1) or temporary resident status under subsection 22(1) made by foreign nationals in Canada and to requests under subsection 25(1) made by foreign nationals outside Canada.​ Attainment of immigration goals​ (2) The processing of applications and requests is to be conducted in a manner that, in the opinion of the Minister, will best support the attainment of the immigration goals established by the Government of Canada.​ * * *​ (7) Nothing in this section in any way limits the power of the Minister to otherwise determine the most efficient manner in which to administer this Act.​点击展开...来信内容好象没贴全呀

评论
2007.10.1递北京;2009.10.16 S2邮件;2010.1.19日S2补料寄北京。(补充：之前状态5）2010.1.29变12;2010年12月CAIPS无果；2011年7月CAIPS查询74分.2011.11.7地址栏消失了几天。2012.3.10Litigation. 超赞 赏 T tguozq 0$(VIP 0) 1,0932012-03-09#6 回复: 北京起诉的同学也没有收到律师最近的3封信吗？快来商量对策啊！应该到联合国告它，影响全球各国几十万人，当年新西兰撤案规模没那么大，当年移民他国也容易得多。

评论
回复: 北京起诉的同学也没有收到律师最近的3封信吗？快来商量对策啊！联合国也好，国际法庭也好，基本都是国家间，或者重大国际政治。加拿大法庭是独立于政府的，虽然我们还是外国人，但是也可以利用法律来诉讼政府，这主要应该是基于人道主义方面救助。

评论
回复: 北京起诉的同学也没有收到律师最近的3封信吗？快来商量对策啊！2002年的时候，CIC突然将分数提高到75分，并且回溯到已交材料但未开始办理的个案，申请人意见很大，后来许多中介公司开始介入（因中介公司也同样受损），并提起诉讼，最终还是对旧案按以前的政策办理（约在2004左右，CIC又将分数改为67分）。可见不是不能解决。请的律师是不是需要了解这一情况，并借鉴一下。

评论
回复: 北京起诉的同学也没有收到律师最近的3封信吗？快来商量对策啊！北京和香港的部分申请人去年底就参入起诉了，其他人还不行动起来吗，还等什么

 ·加拿大房产 大蒙特利尔 - 公寓楼的下水道overflow，弄坏了洗碗机，修理费用
 ·中文新闻 两名渔民在南澳大利亚石灰岩海岸被发现生还，担心他们在海上
·中文新闻 “这样的例子不胜枚举”：澳大利亚女性盖尔·哈迪曼 (Gayle Ha