加拿大华人论坛 加拿大留学移民给哈柏办公室的再回信，请看蓝色部分

在加拿大

Dear Sir:Last several days I joined the demonstration against C-38 in Hongkong. After three days hunger strike and sit-in we submitted a letter to reaffirm that:We strongly oppose the immigration proposal involved in C38 bill.We ask you to process and finalize our files immediately in case that the C38 bill might be passed.We ask to submit our supporting documents with the physical examinations as the processing time schedule.We remain the right to arrange further steps if we could not get satisfied reply before the end of JUNE. Another thing is about your reply I received before the demonstration. Sorry for later to answer. Now I would like to discuss it step by step.Would you please be kind to read it patiently and take my opinion in your consideration? The Office of the Prime Minister has kindly forwarded to the Honourable Jason Kenney, Minister of Citizenship, Immigration and Multiculturalism, a copy of your e-mail of April 16, 2012, concerning the Federal Skilled Worker (FSW) Program. I apologize for the delay in responding.As you may know, skilled workers are selected as permanent residents based on their education, work experience, knowledge of English and/or French, and other criteria that have been shown to help them become economically established in Canada. However, Canada’s attractiveness to immigrants means that each year, we receive more applications than we are able to process.I appreciate Canada although I suppose the immigration system could be more efficient. With a growing backlog, particularly in the FSW category, individuals with the skills and experience wanted by Canadian employers wait years to be admitted. We must have an immigration system that effectively balances Canada’s own needs with its popularity as a destination. That is why the Government of Canada proposed changes to the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act (IRPA). On June 18, 2008, these changes became law. Until these amendments to IRPA, applications under the FSW Program, used to be processed in the order they were received, regardless of whether the applicants’ skills or professions would enable them to find a job in Canada.On November 28, 2008, Minister Kenney announced an Action Plan for Faster Immigration and included a set of Ministerial Instructions (MI-1) with new directives to visa officers reviewing new applications under the FSW program. The number of applications we received under MI-1 exceeded our ability to process them in a timely way.Exactly so called MI-1 is the beginning of nightmare for FSW applications prior to February 27th of 2008. Applicants were suggested to reapply under the MI-1 instructions and actually some of did and got a faster process. Personally I signed a letter to reaffirm that I would like to wait in the queue patiently. So did many applicants. We were not told that we had a tiny piece of possibility to be abandoned otherwise we would not have been waiting so many years. We were not told that we would lose our chance in the end although some of us might eligible to the MI-1. Due to M1-1 instruction the applicants of Hongkong consulate were paused actually. Nearly three years we were forgotten. But the Hongkong consulate website kept telling us that ‘your files are under processing’ Many applicants wrote to the consulate to enquiry the status and got the reply that ‘you need to wait patiently’. Today we found it was the beginning of your cheating!I need to point that the queue-jumping policy is evil and unfair totally for us. The queue-jumping policy is shame on Canada. That is definite infringement to the basic human right. Therefore, June 26, 2010, a second set of Ministerial Instructions (MI-2) were issued. MI-2 introduced a cap on the number of applications per occupation and on the total number of applications in the FSW Program. These changes were made to ensure that the processing of applications would best support the attainment of the immigration goals established by the Government of Canada. MI-2 is welcomed to most past applicants I believe. That is really a method to improve the efficiency from my point of view. On July 1, 2011, a third set of Ministerial Instructions (MI-3) took effect. These new instructions incorporate a number of changes aimed at reducing the current backlog, as well as improving the processing times for current and past applications. Applicants who applied before the processing changes came into effect may wish to review the current criteria of the FSW Program and, if they feel they qualify, may decide to apply and take advantage of the new processing standards. They may choose to either, maintain the first application and submit a new application with a new processing fee or withdraw the first application and submit a new application.If an applicant chooses to withdraw their first application before processing begins, they will receive a refund for the processing fee. Here in MI-3 you still told us that we may choose to maintain the first application and submit a new application with a new processing fee.It is legal to maintain the past applications. But I need to point that no enough evidence shows that the 29 occupations have greater demand than those excluded. Mr. Tim Leahy’s research has proven that others are, in point of fact, in greater demand than the 29 -- significantly greater.CIC studies show that only 36% of immigrants following their "intended occupation". So, how does this micro-managing solve any problem?According MI-3 we were victims of QUEUE-JUMPING policy as well as in MI-1. It is unfair and it is the root reason why there is a huge backlog of FSW applicants. That is due to you did not take us into your consideration. You plan to abandon us from then on. We still received your reply that we had not been forgotten. You were cheating us once and once again. As announced in the Government of Canada’s Economic Action Plan of 2012, Citizenship and Immigration Canada (CIC) will continue processing FSW applications. Should the proposed legislation come into force, CIC will close the applications for which a decision based on selection criteria had not been made before March 29, 2012, and issue refunds for fees paid. Applicants whose files are closed are free to re-apply under the current FSW Program or another immigration program, as long as they meet the eligibility requirements. Here is what I need to focus on: Firstly you CIC accepted my application fee and told me you started to process my file on XXXXof 2007. You suggested that I need to prepare many things to live in Canada including English studying and getting to know the requirements of Canada employers. So I changed my life line aim to adjust the Canada environment smoothly. My family worked together actually. My daughter went to local foreign language school instead of schooling in common high school. The whole family’s life was changed. We could not be back to several years ago. We have the faith in Canada since you did not tell us we might be abandoned, since we believe that you would not cheat us. We applied under the rule of 2006. I am convinced that the rule is still suits to us because the common sense is that the new laws could not trace on the old files if it is not on the behalf of the old files. I am sure you could understand me. If tomorrow C-38 was passed finally and we could be acted by the bill I guess one day there would be a bill to revoke some certain people’s citizenship due to your discrimination, for instance discrimination against Chinese.No doubt that would be awful and you may explain that would not happen in any case. But I am not sure about it. Actually I am worrying about it and I will notice it to all my connections. CIC is transforming its suite of economic immigration programs to create a just-in-time system that recruits people with the right skills to meet Canada’s labour market needs, fast tracks their immigration, and gets them working in a period of months, not years. Eliminating the longstanding backlog of FSW applications will allow the Department to focus resources on facilitating the arrival of skilled immigrants who apply under the current eligibility criteria.Thank you for taking the time to write . I trust that this information is of assistance. I agree with a just-in-time system totally. But the system could not be built on our pain. I would not be the victim of the old system. That is not my responsibility. Speaking to refund us the application fee and no other compensation I absolutely disapprove. From the ending of 2006 my lost is invaluable. I paid twice for my daughter’s school selection. It is over XXXXX. I paid nearly XXXXXfor my husband and my Official transcript(s) of education and other supporting documents in case of submit it on time. The whole family spent much time on English studying. My husband and I gave up the work invitation in other city due to no clear idea about our future. The above lost are visible. As you know the invisible lost is immeasurable. Could we be back to 2006?We could have other choiceS if CIC gave us clear answer that we might be abandoned. You know Australia, New Zealand, or Singapore as my sister’s family did.Now we missed the chance. Could you wipe us out and extinct our dream of Canada? In the bill: (2) For greater certainty, an instruction given under paragraph (3)(c) may provide that the number of applications or requests, by category or otherwise, to be processed in any year be set at ze(2) Subsection (1) does not apply to an application in respect of which a superior court has made a final determination unless the determination is made on or after March 29, 2012. It is obvious defy to the Canada law. Do you agree with it? If it passed the Honorable Minister would have the right that greater than ever. Where was Canada going? The second Germany was in 1939? What would the Minister be? Mr. Hitler? That needs a huge courage I guess. And I believe that would damage Canadians faith in democracy and the conservative party. I would not accept the refund simply if my file was closed.I will insist all my lost due to the cancellation of immigration. I will work for my right to the end.I will unite all the applicants I could to object the evil bill. ONE OF Chinese FSW VICTIM

评论
06年底简表递HK07年5月16日FN VO LCY11年再考YS，自评67分S2 快来吧 超赞 赏 反馈:yannie, 阿施猫, skybluerainman 和 6 其他人 E eric2008 0$(VIP 0) 5322012-06-06#2 回复: 给哈柏办公室的再回信，请看蓝色部分写得非常好。

评论
When nothing goes right...go left 超赞 赏 加 加拿大老熊 0$(VIP 0) 5,3662012-06-06#3 回复: 给哈柏办公室的再回信，请看蓝色部分支持

评论
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]London Ontario[FONT=楷体]中国人对现实里很多不公平有一种难以理解的接受能力，然后成为社会的规则，最后成为文化的一部分。[/FONT][FONT=楷体]三个要饭的故事[/FONT][FONT=宋体][FONT=楷体]看一个社会的好坏有一个很简单的办法：富人是否大量移民。[/FONT][/FONT] 超赞 赏 一 一直潜水 0$(VIP 0) 5862012-06-06#4 回复: 给哈柏办公室的再回信，请看蓝色部分有理有据

评论
2013年加拿大，我来了。 超赞 赏 B beifeng1995 0$(VIP 0) 1,2382012-06-06#5 回复: 给哈柏办公室的再回信，请看蓝色部分谢谢所有的支持！今天放这里明早轰炸全部议员和媒体的邮箱

评论
06年底简表递HK07年5月16日FN VO LCY11年再考YS，自评67分S2 快来吧 超赞 赏 B beifeng1995 0$(VIP 0) 1,2382012-06-06#6 回复: 给哈柏办公室的再回信，请看蓝色部分汗！ 每次再看都找出错误

评论
06年底简表递HK07年5月16日FN VO LCY11年再考YS，自评67分S2 快来吧 超赞 赏 C Chelchel 0$(VIP 0) 342012-06-06#7 回复: 给哈柏办公室的再回信，请看蓝色部分LZ英文了得，佩服敬仰

评论
2007.1.25FN，VO：ISK2012.2.10使馆发出S2补料信2012.5.31使馆签收S2补料2012.6.20 ME 超赞 赏 xzh6339 0$(VIP 0) 5462012-06-06#8 回复: 给哈柏办公室的再回信，请看蓝色部分字字玑珠，追随北风!

评论
When submitted, pregnant, now he is 6. 超赞 赏 T treesvilla 0$(VIP 0) 1922012-06-06#9 回复: 给哈柏办公室的再回信，请看蓝色部分北风，真棒！不过可以多用点复合句了。仅作参考了。换我是没有这个思路来写的，顶！

评论
回复: 给哈柏办公室的再回信，请看蓝色部分希望同时轰炸西方主流媒体，钮时，华邮，金融时报，这些都有读者来信。要给保守党来电国际影响和压力。

评论
回复: 给哈柏办公室的再回信，请看蓝色部分支持北风！！

评论
超赞 赏 B beifeng1995 0$(VIP 0) 1,2382012-06-06#12 回复: 给哈柏办公室的再回信，请看蓝色部分写作才5，5，可能因为习惯简单的表达，汗

评论
06年底简表递HK07年5月16日FN VO LCY11年再考YS，自评67分S2 快来吧 超赞 赏 羽衣蓝格 0$(VIP 0) 1,0762012-06-06#13 回复: 给哈柏办公室的再回信，请看蓝色部分羡慕北风的文才！

评论
疏影横斜水清浅，暗香浮动月黄昏 超赞 赏 雨 雨遥遥 0$(VIP 0) 2482012-06-06#14 回复: 给哈柏办公室的再回信，请看蓝色部分严重支持！

评论
回复: 给哈柏办公室的再回信，请看蓝色部分写作才5，5，可能因为习惯简单的表达，汗点击展开...在战斗中成长，再这么写下去，咱下次写作定能上7!

评论
When submitted, pregnant, now he is 6.在战斗中成长，再这么写下去，咱下次写作定能上7!点击展开...Good point!

评论
06年底简表递HK07年5月16日FN VO LCY11年再考YS，自评67分S2 快来吧 超赞 赏 Y yannie 0$(VIP 0) 2212012-06-06#17 回复: 给哈柏办公室的再回信，请看蓝色部分顶！

评论
。。。。。。 超赞 赏 B beidiao 0$(VIP 0) 3,4182012-06-06#18 回复: 给哈柏办公室的再回信，请看蓝色部分支持！

评论
回复: 给哈柏办公室的再回信，请看蓝色部分支持北风姐姐

评论
回复: 给哈柏办公室的再回信，请看蓝色部分强烈支持

  ·生活百科 来自3个不同的光伏系统的教训
·生活百科 尴尬的屋顶布局