在加拿大
新闻:《诸多恶法：加国政府操作 减少中国移民》的相关评论民主加拿大集权一面：政府操作 减少中国移民 （明报）全加华人联会全国执行主席蔡宏安(图)昨日指出，中国人口最多、申请移民加拿大的量也最多，往年总是稳居移民最大来源，直到最近几点击展开...姜一鸣懂法不,加拿大是案例法,你能打赢官司,别人就得跟随.13个投反对票,冒天下之大不违,不同意本政党的提案,只能辞去国会议员,胆敢投反对票就是道德操守问题.
评论
期权是毒药,以毒攻毒,毒药可治病救人,期权能发家致富.股市有风险,期权更危险,凡跟风者,后果自负. 赏
反馈:劏猪佬 2012-05-24#2 
3,666 $0.00 回复: [评论]诸多恶法：加国政府操作 减少中国移民10点了...好大太阳评论
回复: [评论]诸多恶法：加国政府操作 减少中国移民支持政府操作 现阶段减少中国移民，希望逐步消化，保持种族生态平衡。
评论
愿上帝与我们同在，让我们每天幸福快乐！回复: [评论]诸多恶法：加国政府操作 减少中国移民关于违反宪法问题,这是加拿大人的宪法,对你一个外国人,不适用加拿大宪法,如果你想寻求宪法的帮助,去读中华人民共和国宪法.如果你认为加拿大宪法适用你,直接适用自由宪章,控告加拿大政府违反自由宪章,限制你自由迁徙,胜诉了你就可以自由来加拿大了,想来就来.
评论
期权是毒药,以毒攻毒,毒药可治病救人,期权能发家致富.股市有风险,期权更危险,凡跟风者,后果自负.支持政府操作 现阶段减少中国移民，希望逐步消化，保持种族生态平衡。点击展开... 这样就不对了,凭什么要限制我中国移民,不去限制印巴佬,菲利宾人?做事要讲公平公正.
评论
期权是毒药,以毒攻毒,毒药可治病救人,期权能发家致富.股市有风险,期权更危险,凡跟风者,后果自负.这样就不对了,凭什么要限制我中国移民,不去限制印巴佬,菲利宾人?做事要讲公平公正.点击展开...当然要多选择语言无障碍，文化相近，或者来自盟友国家的移民了，这有什么不对嘛。在说了，也没看见移民的某些苛刻条款只针对华人，而不针对别国的人，谈不上限制你中国移民。
评论
回复: [评论]诸多恶法：加国政府操作 减少中国移民C38法案批评反对声音不断 严重威胁到失业保险金，退休时间，就业以及环保等加国公民利益 NDP建专门网站收集民众信息反对2012预算案 http://budget2012.ndp.ca/ 只有加国本地的才能上去填写个人信息和留言 Speaking out on the Conservative budget
评论
回复: [评论]诸多恶法：加国政府操作 减少中国移民C38法案批评反对声音不断 严重威胁到失业保险金，退休时间，就业以及环保等加国公民利益 NDP建专门网站收集民众信息反对2012预算案 http://budget2012.ndp.ca/ 只有加国本地的才能上去填写个人信息和留言 Speaking out on the Conservative budget http://www.thestar.com/news/canada/p...GgA1g.facebook Federal Budget 2012: Opposition to budget bill galvanizing OTTAWAIt may be the most sweeping overhaul of Canadian law ever contemplated in one piece of legislation: 425 pages of dense legalese that amends or throws out more than 60 existing federal statutes. But for many, the complex uproar over the Conservatives’ budget bill has been reduced to a single remark: “There is no bad job.” It came from Finance Minister Jim Flaherty, who was being pressured to explain the ongoing mystery of how the Conservatives will crack down on jobless people receiving Employment Insurance (EI) once Bill C-38 is passed by Prime Minister Stephen Harper’s majority. Conservatives haven’t divulged how they plan to change the rules governing whether EI recipients can keep collecting benefits. Sources say the federal cabinet will be given the power to set new rules that will make it harder for those collecting EI to pass up jobs they deem unsuitable or too low-paying. That’s what Flaherty seemed to be getting at when he said, “The only bad job is not having a job. I drove a taxi. I refereed hockey.” The remark touched a nerve among Canadians who see the new EI regime as a way to force the unemployed to take any job going or lose their benefits. “It’s an insult to all Canadians not just the unemployed,” said Naveen Mehta, human rights director of United Food and Commercial Workers Canada. “It’s this very elitist, condescending, arrogant approach.” In the Commons, NDP MP David Christopherson said Flaherty can’t tell the difference between “refereeing hockey games while building a future at law school” and “a lifetime of back-breaking work in a mine shaft.” The Conservatives’ “continued attacks on employment insurance are disingenuous, disrespectful and downright disgraceful,” Christopherson said. Nova Scotia Premier Darrell Dexter weighed in, warning Harper that “employment insurance is one of those electric rails in Atlantic Canada that you want to be very, very careful about.” The EI uproar is just one part of a mushroom cloud of controversy spawned by the massive budget implementation legislation. The sweeping bill is a major step in Harper’s long-term campaign to reorient Canada in a more business-friendly, right-wing direction by overhauling social, economic and environmental policies built up over decades. The more that becomes known about the budget bill, the more it seems to be galvanizing opposition to Harper’s agenda. The size and scope of the bill is massive. Opposition MPs demanded that it be broken up into smaller pieces of legislation to allow more scrutiny in Commons committee. The Conservatives refused. Anger is also growing over the government’s determination to use its parliamentary majority to limit debate. It wants the entire package passed before MPs go on summer break next month. “The whole process diminishes the role of Parliament in the making of laws and making sure the people of Canada understand what’s in the laws that are being passed,” says constitutional expert Ned Franks. “To the extent that it takes things that normally would be looked at in, say, 10 committees and puts it into one committee and puts it through in two weeks instead of maybe a month each in the other committees, you’re reducing the parliamentary scrutiny opportunities by a factor of 10 or 20,” Franks said. “That’s pretty significant.” The Conservatives say the bill will receive adequate debate and the wide-ranging environmental measures will be examined by a subcommittee of the Commons finance committee. But that concession is seen as totally inadequate by opposition parties. Aside from the secretive EI reforms, perhaps the most explosive element in Bill C-38 has been the government’s plan to raise the age of eligibility for Old Age Security to 67 from 65 beginning in 2023. Touching as it does on the social safety net and coming without any advance warning from the Conservatives in last year’s election, Harper’s OAS surprise has prompted an angry backlash among seniors. Internal polling by CARP, the seniors’ group, found its members favouring the NDP over the Conservatives for the first time ever. Explaining the impact of the OAS changes, pollster Nik Nanos says seniors are much more worried about being able to pay their bills than they were in years past. Upsetting older Canadians is a risky move, Nanos adds. “I think this could absolutely light the fuse,” he told CBC-TV. “Voter turnout for seniors is, like, 80 per cent. For young Canadians, it’s 50 per cent. So seniors, they punch above their weight. They’re more organized. “But what’s critically important for this particular government is that the Conservative coalition majority is really founded on seniors seniors who are concerned about economic and fiscal issues and want stability,” Nanos observed. “And when the Conservatives start to engage on issues that affect their day-to-day lives, it can be trouble.” The impact on voters so far is hard to gauge. But national opinion surveys have shown an upsurge by the Thomas Mulcair-led NDP in recent weeks that has the left-wing party challenging the Conservatives for top spot in the polls for the first time in recent memory. The NDP is showing impressive strength, says Darrell Bricker, chief executive officer of pollster Ipsos Public Affairs. “You’re looking at the emergence of whatever the counterbalance is to the government.” Another key area of the budget bill contemplates an overhaul of rules and regulations relating to the environment and natural resources an overhaul so extensive that some see it as nothing less than a declaration of war on the green movement. The bill officially scraps Canada’s commitment under the Kyoto Protocol on curbing greenhouse gas emissions and for the first time empowers the federal cabinet to give the go-ahead to pipelines and other major energy projects regardless of the conclusions of regulatory hearings on the feasibility of the projects. Environmental hearings on pipelines and other projects will have time limits and only those directly affected by a project will be allowed to speak at hearings. Another measure would permit Ottawa to bow out of the environmental approval process in cases where a provincial government could hold the needed regulatory hearings. And the budget earmarks $8 million for a Canada Revenue Agency crackdown on the political activities of charities, some of which the Conservatives have accused of money laundering to pay for the activities of environmental groups funded by “foreign radicals.” The process for issuing permits under the Species at Risk Act is being altered and the Fisheries Act is being streamlined so only major bodies of water used for commercial, recreational or aboriginal fisheries will be protected. These far-reaching fisheries changes prompted British Columbia Conservative leader John Cummins to write a personal letter to Harper warning of a voter backlash and complaining that Bill C-38 would put “public ownership” in the hands of the federal fisheries minister rather than Canadians. The minister “then would be able to do as he sees fit with that resource, which may not be in the best interest of the fish or the people, but it is a loss that shouldn’t happen. Historically, we as Canadians, had ownership of the fish and this bill would eliminate that,” Cummins writes. While Bill C-38 would mean bigger fines for businesses that breach environmental regulations, the green movement sees the legislation in its entirety as a groundbreaking attempt to drastically reshape Canada’s stewardship of the environment on behalf of big business. The whole thing has set off alarm bells, says Greenpeace Canada spokesperson Keith Stewart. “People and not just within the environmental movement are looking at this as an attack on nature and democracy. It’s being done, basically, on behalf of the big oil companies. And it’s unprecedented in Canada. Even my international colleagues are aghast at what Canada is doing. Right now, we’re making Russia look good.” One thing no one disagrees on is the scope of Bill C-38, which will bring about changes that will be felt by nearly every Canadian. Among its many other measures: Cuts 19,200 government jobs amid $5.2 billion in spending reductions. Eliminates a wide range of agencies and organizations, from social policy-oriented agencies like the National Council of Welfare and National Aboriginal Health Organization to the watchdog responsible for monitoring the activities of Canada’s spy agency, CSIS. Sweeping changes to immigration law that will allow the government to delete the applications of some 280,000 people who asked to come here as federal skilled workers before 2008. Application fees will be returned. The legislation also refocuses immigration policy on economic needs with measures intended to attract younger, better-qualified workers to directly meet labour market demands. Changes the Temporary Foreign Worker Program so that foreign employees can be paid up to 15 per cent less than the prevailing local wage under certain circumstances. Alters the administration of parks, meaning shorter seasons and fewer services at parks and historic sites. Cuts spending on culture, foreign aid and future health-care transfers to the provinces. The Conservatives say the package is a forward-looking strategy to balance Ottawa’s books and ensure economic growth and job creation over the long term. And they argue that current uncertainty in the global economy means the budget bill needs to be implemented as soon as possible. But opposition MPs say Canadians are waking up to the right-wing agenda buried throughout the massive legislation. “I think the public is becoming more aware of what’s wrong with this regime,” Liberal Leader Bob Rae said. “The kind of dictatorial powers which the prime minister is accruing to himself is causing people some real concerns.” __________________
评论
回复: [评论]诸多恶法：加国政府操作 减少中国移民C38法案批评反对声音不断 严重威胁到失业保险金，退休时间，就业以及环保等加国公民利益 NDP建专门网站收集民众信息反对2012预算案 http://budget2012.ndp.ca/ 只有加国本地的才能上去填写个人信息和留言 Speaking out on the Conservative budget点击展开...done
评论
内事不决问老婆外事不决问Google回复: [评论]诸多恶法：加国政府操作 减少中国移民http://www.thestar.com/news/canada/politics/article/1181079--federal-budget-2012-opposition-to-budget-bill-galvanizing#.T7khO8GgA1g.facebook
评论
回复: [评论]诸多恶法：加国政府操作 减少中国移民done点击展开...谢谢啊，这么快评论完了啊，我还没上去评论呢。
评论
回复: [评论]诸多恶法：加国政府操作 减少中国移民C38中的移民部分只占很小比例，也不是加拿大本地人关心的议题，因为与他们的利益无直接关系，但是这个巨型预算案却有很多东西触及到加国公民的利益。该 法案一旦通过，失业保险金将被削减，目前已引起了EI Uproar（失业金骚乱），退休金领取年龄从65岁延迟到67岁，还有保守党通过法律的形式保障对石油的过度开采也引起了亲环保党派的强烈反对。 在决策上，保守党利用多数党的地位不给公众充分时间来辩论也不断遭到反对。当然保守党继续撒谎掩盖真相。 该报道形容C38引起了蘑菇云般的争议，C38的内容被了解得越多激起的反对行动也越多。
评论
回复: [评论]诸多恶法：加国政府操作 减少中国移民当然要多选择语言无障碍，文化相近，或者来自盟友国家的移民了，这有什么不对嘛。在说了，也没看见移民的某些苛刻条款只针对华人，而不针对别国的人，谈不上限制你中国移民。点击展开... 我只字未提加拿大政府限制我中国移民了,请看清楚,我是回复别人的帖子,他支持减少中国移民.我才提出公平公正.
评论
期权是毒药,以毒攻毒,毒药可治病救人,期权能发家致富.股市有风险,期权更危险,凡跟风者,后果自负.回复: [评论]诸多恶法：加国政府操作 减少中国移民New EI rules takes aim at frequent users, force workers to accept lower payhttp://ca.news.yahoo.com/ei-rules-takes-aim-frequent-users-force-workers-144639800.html
评论
回复: [评论]诸多恶法：加国政府操作 减少中国移民呵呵！
评论
回复: [评论]诸多恶法：加国政府操作 减少中国移民
评论
既来之则安之我只字未提加拿大政府限制我中国移民了,请看清楚,我是回复别人的帖子,他支持减少中国移民.我才提出公平公正.点击展开...这样就不对了,凭什么要限制我中国移民,不去限制印巴佬,菲利宾人?做事要讲公平公正.大象，这不是你说的嘛？
评论
回复: [评论]诸多恶法：加国政府操作 减少中国移民石油不开采，社会不发展，让这些亲环派吃空气去吧，干什么都不能因噎废食呀
评论
回复: [评论]诸多恶法：加国政府操作 减少中国移民评论人士指，保守党一系列前所未见的丑闻揭示加拿大民主政治在过去的一些年堕落之深：哈珀的保守党为了胜利和掌权不则手段，其在大选中舞弊并获得铁证。 掌权后保守党部长们用纳税人的金钱奢华挥霍的丑闻不断；为购买战机，明目张胆的对加拿大最高权力机构国会和公众隐瞒高达100亿加元的开支；将长达4百多页数百项不相关的法案修改绑定在一起，包括可能影响子孙后代的政策修改（削老人福利，修改EI政策,一刀切28万移民积案，授权移民部长新政追溯旧案等等），作为联邦预算实现法案（C-38），要在短短一个月内（国会看都看不过来，更不用说辩论了）要强行全部通过。 家园温哥华,vancouver.iask.ca
·汽车 请推荐一款适合女生开的车（汽油款）
·汽车 我在路边停车时被刮伤了，如何申请保险？