加拿大华人论坛 加拿大留学移民Jason Kenney in Telegraph

在加拿大

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/personalfinance/offshorefinance/9583522/Canada-woos-unemployed-British-graduates.html Canada woos unemployed British graduates In an interview with Telegraph Expat, Canadian minister says he wants young Britons "to think Canada, not Australia" when looking for work abroad. Canada is planning to woo unemployed British graduates in order to compete more fiercely with Australia for skilled young expats. Canadian immigration minister Jason Kenney will travel to London next week as part of accelerated efforts to tackle acute labour shortages in his home country. In an interview with Telegraph Expat, Mr Kenney said he wants to convince UK graduates who may be struggling to find jobs in recession-hit Britain to “think Canada before you think Australia”. During his five-day trip, he is due to meet figures including the UK immigration minister Mark Harper to discuss economic opportunities for British workers. Canada wants to attract young skilled migrants due to its ageing workforce and unfilled positions in areas such as in IT, engineering, welding and video games programming. To entice migrants, the length of time they need to work in skilled Canadian jobs to qualify for permanent residency is being halved from two years to one. The change is likely to take effect from next January. It is hoped this will encourage young people who go to Canada to work in gap year jobs in bars or ski resorts, but then find more skilled work, to settle in Canada in the longer term. Mr Kenney said: “There are a lot of young Britons who are under-employed or unemployed but are highly educated. “I think so many young Britons have, for some reason, thought of Australia before Canada as a destination for immigration, and we want to be at the front of the competition for the world’s best and brightest.” He put Australia’s enduring appeal down to “rugby and cricket, and Neighbours, and the attraction of the weather”. Reasons to choose Canada over Australia, he said, included its closer proximity to the UK and robust economy ? “the strongest in the G8”. However, there is disagreement within Canada as to whether the government should be retraining its own workers rather than recruiting from overseas. The row intensified last week when official statistics revealed that increasing immigration levels had pushed Canada’s population growth up by 1.1 per cent in the past year ? the highest rate in the G8. Aattempts to reduce the proportion of non-English speaking migrants have also sparked charges of xenophobia, which Mr Kenney has strongly denied. The immigration reforms have additionally involved cancelling 280,000 residency applications from people who had waited up to nine years for a decision. Legal challenges are ongoing. Meanwhile, Australia is equally determined to compete for skilled migrants. A spokesman for Australia’s Department of Immigration and Citizenship said the Australian lifestyle and strong economy continued to be major draws. He highlighted that Australia is ranked second on the human development index, compared with Canada’s sixth place, and has the lowest unemployment rate for migrants of any OECD country.

评论
​回复: Jason Kenney通过这篇Telegraph的访谈亮出了种族主义的底牌他不仅通过立法给白人准移民广开大门，还身体力行去英国和爱尔兰拉客

评论
​回复: Jason Kenney通过这篇Telegraph的访谈亮出了种族主义的底牌woo vt. 求爱，求婚；争取……的支持； vi. 求爱；恳求； Canada woos unemployed British graduates 加拿大向失业的英国大学生求爱

评论
​回复: Jason Kenney通过这篇Telegraph的访谈亮出了种族主义的底牌现在已经赤果果的了 遮盖不住了

评论
回复: Jason Kenney通过这篇Telegraph的访谈亮出了种族主义的底牌从各种新政出台到一刀切，他和政府的种族主义倾向早就十分消楚了，所以当初我还提议从种族歧视角度切入打官司呢。

评论
回复: Jason Kenney通过这篇Telegraph的访谈亮出了种族主义的底牌Harper是新教徒，kenny是天主教徒，在北爱尔兰70年代到90年代初的25年混战中，3600多人丧生，其中除了与英军的对立，还有就是新教与天主教的冲突，简单讲新教相信上帝和圣经，而天主教不相信上帝造人，他们认为除了上帝还有教皇 (Pope)，这就是为什麽Kenny支持堕胎法案，而在正式场合他有戴一条绿色的领带，这种绿不是一般的绿，而是爱尔兰绿，但在到华人社区时，他往往不戴领带，爱尔兰人的民族凝聚性是非常强的，也就是凯尔特人(Celtics), 在NBA着爱尔兰绿战袍的，Celtics在Boston和Chicago有很大的族群，看过Harrison Ford的亡命天涯(Fugitive)其中一个段落就是在芝加哥Celtics的游行队伍中逃脱的，它们戴绿帽，着绿裙，穿绿鞋，还有近期在CHC台看了两遍爱国者游戏(Patriot Games)，爱尔兰人疯狂的民族气节和报复心态在西方是十分突出的。 Kenny近期不仅在本土希望来访的爱尔兰劳工留下，更是明目张胆地到爱尔兰抓壮丁，完全不顾加国脸面，完全超出了移民部长的范畴，干起了劳工部人事部的差事. 他的祖父是加拿大著名的爵士音乐家: thecanadianencyclopedia.com Herbert Martin "Mart" Kenney was a Canadian jazz musician and bandleader whose big band Mart Kenney and His Western Gentlemen was Canada's premier dance band during the 1930s and 1940s听音乐的人知道爵士乐最大的特点就是随机应变，也就是“没谱儿"，这就是为什麽他的孙子一但有了生杀大权，朝令夕改，无诚信可言的基因所致。 虽然Harper和Kenny都住在卡尔加里，同在保守党卡尔加里的不同选区，但Harper是个老狐狸，去年大选Kenny是想做外交部长的，但没有如愿，这一年多移民部，其实是移民部长的大刀闪闪，有个人政治报复(Political Revenge)的意念，Harper没有出面哪怕一次表态，Minister Instruction 正在摧毁加拿大的诚信体系，多元文化体系，而他手里也一定握着Harper的小辫子，慈禧拿李莲英也没办法。 他宣称的2014年退休前如何如何实则是在威胁把加拿大搞乱，而恢复民主的诚信和秩序要很多年，他就是要给下届留下一个烂摊子！ 政治家如果为民着想就当不了政治家，这一点同胞应该体会深刻吧！在天朝其实是小儿科，只是出现在加拿大这样的国度实在不应该，加拿大的未来将为此付出沉重的代价，尤其是亚裔新老移民族群也不能幸免！没有登录的还可以转向，已登录的将深受其害！ Question: "What is the difference between Catholics and Protestants?" Answer: There are several very important differences between Catholics and Protestants. While there have been some attempts over the last several years to find common ground between the two groups, the fact is that the differences remain, and they are just as important today as they were at the beginning of the Protestant Reformation. Following is brief summary of some of the more important differences. One of the first major differences between Catholicism and Protestantism is the issue of the sufficiency and authority of Scripture. Protestants believe that the Bible alone is the sole source of God’s special revelation to mankind, and as such it teaches us all that is necessary for our salvation from sin. Protestants view the Bible as the standard by which all Christian behavior must be measured. This belief is commonly referred to as “sola scriptura” and is one of the “five solas” (sola being Latin for “alone”) that came out of the Protestant Reformation as summaries of some of the important differences between Catholics and Protestants. While there are many verses in the Bible that establish its authority and its sufficiency for all matters of faith and practice, one of the clearest is 2 Timothy 3:16, where we see that “all Scripture is inspired by God and profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, for training in righteousness; that the man of God may be adequate, equipped for every good work.” Catholics, on the other hand, reject the doctrine of sola scriptura and do not believe that the Bible alone is sufficient. They believe that both the Bible and sacred Roman Catholic tradition are equally binding upon the Christian. Many Roman Catholics doctrines, such as purgatory, praying to the saints, worship or veneration of Mary, etc., have little or no basis at all in Scripture, but are based solely on Roman Catholic traditions. Essentially the Roman Catholic Church’s denial of sola scriptura and their insistence that both the Bible and their sacred tradition are equal in authority undermine the sufficiency, authority and completeness of the Bible. The view of Scripture is at the root of many, if not all, of the differences between Catholics and Protestants. Another disagreement between Catholicism and Protestantism is over the office and authority of the Pope. According to Catholicism the Pope is the “Vicar of Christ” (a vicar is a substitute), and takes the place of Jesus as the visible head of the Church. As such, he has the ability to speak ex cathedra (with authority on matters of faith and practice), and when he does so his teachings are considered infallible and binding upon all Christians. On the other hand, Protestants believe that no human being is infallible, and that Christ alone is the Head of the Church. Catholics rely on apostolic succession as a way of trying to establish the Pope’s authority. But Protestants believe that the church’s authority does not come from apostolic succession, but instead is derived from the Word of God. Spiritual power and authority does not rest in the hands of a mere man, but in the very Word of God. While Catholicism teaches that only the Catholic Church can properly and correctly interpret the Bible, Protestants believe that the Bible teaches that God sent the Holy Spirit to indwell all born-again believers, enabling all believers to understand the message of the Bible. This is clearly seen in passages such as John 14:16-17: “I will ask the Father, and He will give you another Helper, that He may be with you forever; that is the Spirit of truth, whom the world cannot receive, because it does not see Him or know Him, but you know Him because He abides with you and will be in you.” (See also John 14:26 and 1 John 2:27). While Catholicism teaches that only the Roman Catholic Church has the authority and power to interpret the Bible, Protestantism acknowledges the biblical doctrine of the priesthood of all believers, and that individual Christians can trust the Holy Spirit for guidance in reading and interpreting the Bible for themselves. A third major difference between Catholicism and Protestantism is how one is saved. Another of the five solas of the Reformation was sola fide (“faith alone”), which affirms the biblical doctrine of justification by grace alone through faith alone because of Christ alone (Ephesians 2:8-10). However, according to Roman Catholicism, man cannot be saved by faith alone in Christ alone. Catholics teach that the Christian must rely on faith plus “meritorious works” in order to be saved. Essential to the Roman Catholic doctrine of salvation are the Seven Sacraments, which are baptism, confirmation, the Eucharist, penance, anointing of the sick, holy orders, and matrimony. Protestants believe that, on the basis of faith in Christ alone, believers are justified by God as all their sins are paid for by Christ on the cross and His righteousness is imputed to them. Catholics, on the other hand, believe that Christ’s righteousness is imparted to the believer by “grace through faith,” but in itself it is not sufficient to justify the believer. The believer must “supplement” the righteousness of Christ imparted to him with meritorious works. Catholics and Protestants also disagree on what it means to be justified before God. To the Catholic, justification involves being made righteous and holy. They believe that faith in Christ is only the beginning of salvation, and that the individual must build upon that with good works because “man has to merit God’s grace of justification and eternal salvation.” Of course, this view of justification contradicts the clear teaching of Scripture in passages such as Romans 4:1-12; Titus 3:3-7, as well as many others. On the other hand, Protestants distinguish between the one-time act of justification (when we are declared righteous and holy by God based on our faith in Christ’s atonement on the cross) and sanctification (the ongoing process of being made righteous that continues throughout our lives on earth). While Protestants recognize that works are important, they believe they are the result or fruit of salvation, but never the means to it. Catholics blend justification and sanctification together into one ongoing process, which leads to confusion about how one is saved. A fourth major difference between Catholics and Protestants has to do with what happens after men die. While both believe that unbelievers will spend eternity in hell, there are significant and important differences as to what happens to believers. From their church traditions and their reliance on non-canonical books, the Catholics have developed the doctrine of purgatory. Purgatory, according to the Catholic Encyclopedia, is a “place or condition of temporal punishment for those who, departing this life in God’s grace are, not entirely free from venial faults, or have not fully paid the satisfaction due to their transgressions.” On the other hand, Protestants believe that because we are justified by faith in Christ alone, and that Christ’s righteousness is imputed to us when we die we will go straight to heaven to be in the presence of the Lord (2 Corinthians 5:6-10 and Philippians 1:23). One disturbing aspect about the Catholic doctrine of purgatory is the belief that man must, or that he even can, pay for his own sins. This, along with the Catholic misunderstanding of what the Bible teaches about how man is justified before God, results in a low view of the sufficiency and efficiency of Christ’s atonement on the cross. Simply put, the Roman Catholic viewpoint on salvation implies that Christ’s atonement on the cross was not sufficient payment for the sins of those who believe in Him, and that even a believer must atone for or pay for his own sins, either through acts of penance, or time in purgatory. Yet the Bible teaches over and over again that it is Christ’s death alone that can satisfy or propitiate God’s wrath against sinners (Romans 3:25; Hebrews 2:17; 1 John 2:2; 1 John 4:10). Our works of righteousness cannot add to what Christ has already accomplished. While there are numerous other differences between what Catholics and Protestants believe, these four distinctions should be adequate to establish that there are serious differences between the two. Paul wrote Galatians to combat the Judaizers (Jews who said that Gentile Christians had to obey the Old Testament Law to be saved). In the same way, Catholics, by making works necessary for one to be justified by God, end up with a completely different gospel. The differences between Catholicism and evangelical Protestants are important and significant. It is our prayer that God will open the eyes of anyone reading this article who is putting his or her faith in the teachings of the Catholic Church. It is our hope that everyone will understand and believe that his “works of righteousness” cannot justify him or sanctify him (Isaiah 64:6). It is our prayer that all will instead put their faith solely in the fact that we are “justified as a gift by His grace through the redemption which is in Christ Jesus, whom God displayed as a propitiation in His blood through faith.” (Romans 3:24-25). God saves us, “not on the basis of deeds which we have done in righteousness, but according to His mercy, by the washing of regeneration and renewing by the Holy Spirit, whom He poured out upon us richly through Jesus Christ our Savior, so that being justified by His grace we would be made heirs according to the hope of eternal life” (Titus 3:5-7).

评论
回复: Jason Kenney通过这篇Telegraph的访谈亮出了种族主义的底牌已经登陆的，也可以选择回流。

评论
回复: Jason Kenney通过这篇Telegraph的访谈亮出了种族主义的底牌[FONT=宋体]的确[/FONT], [FONT=宋体]这种国家不值得留恋[/FONT], [FONT=宋体]就这能力[/FONT], [FONT=宋体]当米国的走狗已万分抬举它[/FONT]. [FONT=宋体]赔偿我们是必需的[/FONT].

评论
回复: Jason Kenney通过这篇Telegraph的访谈亮出了种族主义的底牌[FONT=宋体]的确[/FONT], [FONT=宋体]这种国家不值得留恋[/FONT], [FONT=宋体]就这能力[/FONT], [FONT=宋体]当米国的走狗已万分抬举它[/FONT]. [FONT=宋体]赔偿我们是必需的[/FONT].点击展开...C38已经剥夺了申请人索取赔偿的权利.

评论
回复: Jason Kenney通过这篇Telegraph的访谈亮出了种族主义的底牌已经登陆的，也可以选择回流。点击展开...这话你说给康肥吧他家都登陆很久了

评论
回复: Jason Kenney通过这篇Telegraph的访谈亮出了种族主义的底牌因此，这一点充全暴露了康肥所谓移民过剩，一刀切为了所谓的”国家利益“全是一所谎言，”国家利益“不过是种族主义的幌子。

评论
回复: Jason Kenney通过这篇Telegraph的访谈亮出了种族主义的底牌，唉，有什么用啊？本国人都视他为改革英雄

评论
回复: Jason Kenney通过这篇Telegraph的访谈亮出了种族主义的底牌好像也去Ireland？

评论
===================Fight, Love, Make MistakeHarper是新教徒，kenny是天主教徒，在北爱尔兰70年代到90年代初的25年混战中，3600多人丧生，其中除了与英军的对立，还有就是新教与天主教的冲突，简单讲新教相信上帝和圣经，而天主教不相信上帝造人，他们认为除了上帝还有教皇 (Pope)，这就是为什麽Kenny支持堕胎法案，而在正式场合他有戴一条绿色的领带，这种绿不是一般的绿，而是爱尔兰绿，但在到华人社区时，他往往不戴领带，爱尔兰人的民族凝聚性是非常强的，也就是凯尔特人(Celtics), 在NBA着爱尔兰绿战袍的，Celtics在Boston和Chicago有很大的族群，看过Harrison Ford的亡命天涯(Fugitive)其中一个段落就是在芝加哥Celtics的游行队伍中逃脱的，它们戴绿帽，着绿裙，穿绿鞋，还有近期在CHC台看了两遍爱国者游戏(Patriot Games)，爱尔兰人疯狂的民族气节和报复心态在西方是十分突出的。 Kenny近期不仅在本土希望来访的爱尔兰劳工留下，更是明目张胆地到爱尔兰抓壮丁，完全不顾加国脸面，完全超出了移民部长的范畴，干起了劳工部人事部的差事. 他的祖父是加拿大著名的爵士音乐家: thecanadianencyclopedia.com Herbert Martin "Mart" Kenney was a Canadian jazz musician and bandleader whose big band Mart Kenney and His Western Gentlemen was Canada's premier dance band during the 1930s and 1940s 虽然Harper和Kenny都住在卡尔加里，同在保守党卡尔加里的不同选区，但Harper是个老狐狸，去年大选Kenny是想做外交部长的，但没有如愿，这一年多移民部，其实是移民部长的大刀闪闪，有个人政治报复(Political Revenge)的意念，Harper没有出面哪怕一次表态，Minister Instruction 正在摧毁加拿大的诚信体系，多元文化体系，而他手里也一定握着Harper的小辫子，慈禧拿李莲英也没办法。 他宣称的2014年退休前如何如何实则是在威胁把加拿大搞乱，而恢复民主的诚信和秩序要很多年，他就是要给下届留下一个烂摊子！ 政治家如果为民着想就当不了政治家，这一点同胞应该体会深刻吧！在天朝其实是小儿科，只是出现在加拿大这样的国度实在不应该，加拿大的未来将为此付出沉重的代价，尤其是亚裔新老移民族群也不能幸免！没有登录的还可以转向，已登录的将深受其害！ Question: "What is the difference between Catholics and Protestants?" Answer: There are several very important differences between Catholics and Protestants. While there have been some attempts over the last several years to find common ground between the two groups, the fact is that the differences remain, and they are just as important today as they were at the beginning of the Protestant Reformation. Following is brief summary of some of the more important differences. One of the first major differences between Catholicism and Protestantism is the issue of the sufficiency and authority of Scripture. Protestants believe that the Bible alone is the sole source of God’s special revelation to mankind, and as such it teaches us all that is necessary for our salvation from sin. Protestants view the Bible as the standard by which all Christian behavior must be measured. This belief is commonly referred to as “sola scriptura” and is one of the “five solas” (sola being Latin for “alone”) that came out of the Protestant Reformation as summaries of some of the important differences between Catholics and Protestants. While there are many verses in the Bible that establish its authority and its sufficiency for all matters of faith and practice, one of the clearest is 2 Timothy 3:16, where we see that “all Scripture is inspired by God and profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, for training in righteousness; that the man of God may be adequate, equipped for every good work.” Catholics, on the other hand, reject the doctrine of sola scriptura and do not believe that the Bible alone is sufficient. They believe that both the Bible and sacred Roman Catholic tradition are equally binding upon the Christian. Many Roman Catholics doctrines, such as purgatory, praying to the saints, worship or veneration of Mary, etc., have little or no basis at all in Scripture, but are based solely on Roman Catholic traditions. Essentially the Roman Catholic Church’s denial of sola scriptura and their insistence that both the Bible and their sacred tradition are equal in authority undermine the sufficiency, authority and completeness of the Bible. The view of Scripture is at the root of many, if not all, of the differences between Catholics and Protestants. Another disagreement between Catholicism and Protestantism is over the office and authority of the Pope. According to Catholicism the Pope is the “Vicar of Christ” (a vicar is a substitute), and takes the place of Jesus as the visible head of the Church. As such, he has the ability to speak ex cathedra (with authority on matters of faith and practice), and when he does so his teachings are considered infallible and binding upon all Christians. On the other hand, Protestants believe that no human being is infallible, and that Christ alone is the Head of the Church. Catholics rely on apostolic succession as a way of trying to establish the Pope’s authority. But Protestants believe that the church’s authority does not come from apostolic succession, but instead is derived from the Word of God. Spiritual power and authority does not rest in the hands of a mere man, but in the very Word of God. While Catholicism teaches that only the Catholic Church can properly and correctly interpret the Bible, Protestants believe that the Bible teaches that God sent the Holy Spirit to indwell all born-again believers, enabling all believers to understand the message of the Bible. This is clearly seen in passages such as John 14:16-17: “I will ask the Father, and He will give you another Helper, that He may be with you forever; that is the Spirit of truth, whom the world cannot receive, because it does not see Him or know Him, but you know Him because He abides with you and will be in you.” (See also John 14:26 and 1 John 2:27). While Catholicism teaches that only the Roman Catholic Church has the authority and power to interpret the Bible, Protestantism acknowledges the biblical doctrine of the priesthood of all believers, and that individual Christians can trust the Holy Spirit for guidance in reading and interpreting the Bible for themselves. A third major difference between Catholicism and Protestantism is how one is saved. Another of the five solas of the Reformation was sola fide (“faith alone”), which affirms the biblical doctrine of justification by grace alone through faith alone because of Christ alone (Ephesians 2:8-10). However, according to Roman Catholicism, man cannot be saved by faith alone in Christ alone. Catholics teach that the Christian must rely on faith plus “meritorious works” in order to be saved. Essential to the Roman Catholic doctrine of salvation are the Seven Sacraments, which are baptism, confirmation, the Eucharist, penance, anointing of the sick, holy orders, and matrimony. Protestants believe that, on the basis of faith in Christ alone, believers are justified by God as all their sins are paid for by Christ on the cross and His righteousness is imputed to them. Catholics, on the other hand, believe that Christ’s righteousness is imparted to the believer by “grace through faith,” but in itself it is not sufficient to justify the believer. The believer must “supplement” the righteousness of Christ imparted to him with meritorious works. Catholics and Protestants also disagree on what it means to be justified before God. To the Catholic, justification involves being made righteous and holy. They believe that faith in Christ is only the beginning of salvation, and that the individual must build upon that with good works because “man has to merit God’s grace of justification and eternal salvation.” Of course, this view of justification contradicts the clear teaching of Scripture in passages such as Romans 4:1-12; Titus 3:3-7, as well as many others. On the other hand, Protestants distinguish between the one-time act of justification (when we are declared righteous and holy by God based on our faith in Christ’s atonement on the cross) and sanctification (the ongoing process of being made righteous that continues throughout our lives on earth). While Protestants recognize that works are important, they believe they are the result or fruit of salvation, but never the means to it. Catholics blend justification and sanctification together into one ongoing process, which leads to confusion about how one is saved. A fourth major difference between Catholics and Protestants has to do with what happens after men die. While both believe that unbelievers will spend eternity in hell, there are significant and important differences as to what happens to believers. From their church traditions and their reliance on non-canonical books, the Catholics have developed the doctrine of purgatory. Purgatory, according to the Catholic Encyclopedia, is a “place or condition of temporal punishment for those who, departing this life in God’s grace are, not entirely free from venial faults, or have not fully paid the satisfaction due to their transgressions.” On the other hand, Protestants believe that because we are justified by faith in Christ alone, and that Christ’s righteousness is imputed to us when we die we will go straight to heaven to be in the presence of the Lord (2 Corinthians 5:6-10 and Philippians 1:23). One disturbing aspect about the Catholic doctrine of purgatory is the belief that man must, or that he even can, pay for his own sins. This, along with the Catholic misunderstanding of what the Bible teaches about how man is justified before God, results in a low view of the sufficiency and efficiency of Christ’s atonement on the cross. Simply put, the Roman Catholic viewpoint on salvation implies that Christ’s atonement on the cross was not sufficient payment for the sins of those who believe in Him, and that even a believer must atone for or pay for his own sins, either through acts of penance, or time in purgatory. Yet the Bible teaches over and over again that it is Christ’s death alone that can satisfy or propitiate God’s wrath against sinners (Romans 3:25; Hebrews 2:17; 1 John 2:2; 1 John 4:10). Our works of righteousness cannot add to what Christ has already accomplished. While there are numerous other differences between what Catholics and Protestants believe, these four distinctions should be adequate to establish that there are serious differences between the two. Paul wrote Galatians to combat the Judaizers (Jews who said that Gentile Christians had to obey the Old Testament Law to be saved). In the same way, Catholics, by making works necessary for one to be justified by God, end up with a completely different gospel. The differences between Catholicism and evangelical Protestants are important and significant. It is our prayer that God will open the eyes of anyone reading this article who is putting his or her faith in the teachings of the Catholic Church. It is our hope that everyone will understand and believe that his “works of righteousness” cannot justify him or sanctify him (Isaiah 64:6). It is our prayer that all will instead put their faith solely in the fact that we are “justified as a gift by His grace through the redemption which is in Christ Jesus, whom God displayed as a propitiation in His blood through faith.” (Romans 3:24-25). God saves us, “not on the basis of deeds which we have done in righteousness, but according to His mercy, by the washing of regeneration and renewing by the Holy Spirit, whom He poured out upon us richly through Jesus Christ our Savior, so that being justified by His grace we would be made heirs according to the hope of eternal life” (Titus 3:5-7).点击展开...

评论
回复: Jason Kenney通过这篇Telegraph的访谈亮出了种族主义的底牌我说一句话楼主别生气，爱尔兰裔为北美发展贡献最大有目共睹，今天爱尔兰裔移民的整体素质也比来自东欧、中东南亚中国的移民高出一截，所以部长先生做的也不太过分。

评论
人生何处不相逢，与人为善，乐事也！回复: Jason Kenney通过这篇Telegraph的访谈亮出了种族主义的底牌..../

评论
​回复: Jason Kenney通过这篇Telegraph的访谈亮出了种族主义的底牌看来文章触动了登陆者的神经，本文没有任何抹杀或诋毁爱尔兰人功绩的意图，而是指将民族情感和宗教信仰至于管理国家，公平，公正，诚信之上的少数政客在利用手中的权利，请注意Steve Jobs生父是叙利亚阿拉伯人，生母是日耳曼人，美国虽有诸多问题，但谁能否认他的强大来自于包容和公平。其实JK并不是针对中国人的，而是仕途需要他玩耍手中的权利，这一点在特定体制下适用于任何种族。 我们全家等待快三年了，即便现在给我移民纸，我也不敢去了， 是不敢，不是不愿，出龙潭，入虎穴（可能不是那么严重）。 好像你说的不是太过份，也就是按国内的话说已经比较过份了！

评论
回复: Jason Kenney通过这篇Telegraph的访谈亮出了种族主义的底牌看来文章触动了登陆者的神经，本文没有任何抹杀或诋毁爱尔兰人功绩的意图，而是指将民族情感和宗教信仰至于管理国家，公平，公正，诚信之上的少数政客在利用手中的权利，请注意Steve Jobs生父是叙利亚阿拉伯人，生母是日耳曼人，美国虽有诸多问题，但谁能否认他的强大来自于包容和公平。其实JK并不是针对中国人的，而是仕途需要他玩耍手中的权利，这一点在特定体制下适用于任何种族。 我们全家等待快三年了，即便现在给我移民纸，我也不敢去了， 是不敢，不是不愿，出龙潭，入虎穴（可能不是那么严重）。 好像你说的不是太过份，也就是按国内的话说已经比较过份了！点击展开...才不到三年？投资的？来这里的投资的朋友挺多的呀

  ·生活百科 业主自住保险涨得这么快！
·生活百科 在澳洲可以零元买吗？一位阿姨推着一车食物从超市走出。保安