加拿大华人论坛 加拿大留学移民美国投资移民 - 829绿卡的挽救措施

在加拿大

虽然大部分投资人还在选项目，申请526的阶段。但有相当一部分投资人已经在829申请阶段。 526申请通过，登陆拿临时绿卡后，投资人一般就是熬时间，等829的申请。如果万一项目出了问题，829申请的前景不妙，投资人该这么办呢？ 大家来参加讨论，特别是移民律师来些建议吧。 就向以前我说过，526通过只是订婚戒指，829通过才是结婚证书。829申请不通过，移民美国是前功尽弃。

评论
回复: 829绿卡的挽救措施孩子在那里读书,是不是也要赶回? 是否申请留学,大人申请陪读/

评论
回复: 829绿卡的挽救措施孩子在那里读书,是不是也要赶回? 是否申请留学,大人申请陪读/点击展开...建议在临时绿卡到期前6个月，找非常资深的EB-5移民律师为你准备829申请，不要用项目方的律师。 自己的律师可以公正的评估投资人的829风险。如项目有问题，投资人自己的律师会尽早想办法。就不必等移民局拒绝829申请后在陷困境了。 这个EB-5投资，申请526到829的过程中，投资人自己雇移民律师可以全程保护自己的利益。

评论
回复: 829绿卡的挽救措施I-829 conditions removal denials http://www.eb-5center.com/node/488 * Note that it is very important to contact an experienced EB-5 attorney when you receive a RFE on I-829 case and not wait until USCIS actually issues a formal denial notice. You need to craft a well-reasoned RFE response with a future appeal in mind. When it comes to an EB-5 case, even after an EB-5 investor obtains a conditional green card status, he or she has to be concerned about the possibility of I-829 denial in our opinion, there are too many key issues on which clear and practical guidelines from USCIS are lacking, thereby impeding the growth of the EB-5 Program. In addition, USCIS has created additional immigration risks by its failure to clearly and reasonably define "material changes" AFTER I-526 approval which increases the immigration risks of EB-5 investors. Right now, many types of changes AFTER I-526 petition approval can be deemed by USCIS to amount to "material change" and therefore lead to a denial of I-829. In our opinion, there are two kinds of denials: lawful and unlawful ones. You would think that USCIS would give you a benefit of doubt when a foreign EB-5 investor invests $500,000 USD or more into a U.S. commercial enterprise and moves his family to the United States and spends additional moneys to help the U.S. economy by purchasing house, car and other assets, but no, that's not the case. USCIS will deny your I-829 case unless you prove to their satisfaction that you met what USCIS believes are the requirements for the conditionals removal. Therefore, "reasonable" denials are those that an experienced EB-5 practitioner tells you that the I-829 requirements have not been met; and "unreasonable" denials are where a strong argument could be made that you met the I-829 requirements but CSC does not agree with your position EITHER because a good argument can be made that the USCIS examiner misunderstood the I-829 requirements OR USCIS is denying the I-829 case based on one of its guidance memos which do not carry the effect of a binding law. We are not kidding when we tell you that there is a plethora of key I-829 issues which are not at all clearly covered by the current EB-5 statutes and/or regulations. This is not because CSC is out to "get" the I-829 petitioners but because the existing regulations are full of holes, and the way CSC is interpreting these unclear areas sometimes do not comport with commercial realities. Actually, EB-5 statute is written very broadly to allow I-829 investors-petitioners to meet the specific EB-5 requirements substantially and in good faith. [Sometimes I wonder whether USCIS pays attention to the "substantially and in good faith" phrase because I have never seen USCIS approve I-829 based on this phrase, just as I have never seen AAO disagree with USCIS' decision.] Moreover, when you read USCIS issued guidances on EB-5 area, it says clearly that the guidance memos do not establish law and is not to be relied upon in litigation, etc. In other words, there are "huge" black holes in EB-5 law when it comes to I-829 issues -- mainly because these issues have never arisen before. Depending on the types of attitudes that prevail among the USCIS officials in charge of the EB-5 division, they can either choke the EB-5 Program or let it flourish. In our opinion, they are similar to Federal Reserve officials who must know when to tighten and when to loosen up their grips on EB-5 law and/or regional centers. USCIS has to be fair and reasonable in its administration of the EB-5 Program, especially because they are the one who had public hearings in 2003 encouraging people to form regional centers and telling everyone that they will be fair and reasonable. Now, it is crucial that you obtain proper advice from an experienced EB-5 practitioner when you receive Request For Evidence in connection with your I-829 petition. You need to do everything possible to properly analyze what CSC is asking and to be persuasive in your responses. Therefore, the worst thing you can do is to wait until CSC actually sends you a denial letter before retaining an experienced EB-5 practitioner.

评论
回复: 829绿卡的挽救措施孩子在那里读书,是不是也要赶回? 是否申请留学,大人申请陪读/点击展开...如果拿到829被拒的通知，留在美国的机会和可能性也不多的。所以投资人一定不要等到这个时候才行动，上诉跟移民局打官司。 临时绿卡到期6个月前，自己雇非项目方的律师，研究自己829的风险是多少，主动面对这个问题。如果829的申请前景不妙，马上要准备转项目，再投资，转身份。 投资人应该跟项目方打官司，要回投资款。这比跟移民局打官司有效多了。

评论
回复: 829绿卡的挽救措施如果拿到829被拒的通知，留在美国的机会和可能性也不多的。所以投资人一定不要等到这个时候才行动，上诉跟移民局打官司。临时绿卡到期6个月前，自己雇非项目方的律师，研究自己829的风险是多少，主动面对这个问题。如果829的申请前景不妙，马上要准备转项目，再投资，转身份。投资人应该跟项目方打官司，要回投资款。这比跟移民局打官司有效多了。点击展开...那么早研究，项目方能配合提供资料吗？

评论
回复: 829绿卡的挽救措施那么早研究，项目方能配合提供资料吗？点击展开...投资人是项目的合伙人之一，审查项目的是投资人的权力。如果项目方拒绝给提供资料，投资人可以投诉给移民局。LP协议上明确了投资人的一些权力，移民局会审查投资人行使这些权力的相关资料。 我现在还要雇我的投资人帮我督察项目的运作呢。让投资人自己督察项目的进展，达到各项指标，保证他们的永久绿卡通过，5年后资金的返回。 我现在事情太多，就把一些职责转给别人做。我为我的投资人在我合伙人的势力范围内找份工作。所以我们的EB-5投资项目是：投资50万，拿一张绿卡，得一份工作。

评论
回复: 829绿卡的挽救措施投资人是项目的合伙人之一，审查项目的是投资人的权力。如果项目方拒绝给提供资料，投资人可以投诉给移民局。LP协议上明确了投资人的一些权力，移民局会审查投资人行使这些权力的相关资料。 我现在还要雇我的投资人帮我督察项目的运作呢。让投资人自己督察项目的进展，达到各项指标，保证他们的永久绿卡通过，5年后资金的返回。 我现在事情太多，就把一些职责转给别人做。我为我的投资人在我合伙人的势力范围内找份工作。所以我们的EB-5投资项目是：投资50万，拿一张绿卡，得一份工作。点击展开...非常人性化的项目。

评论
回复: 829绿卡的挽救措施投资人是项目的合伙人之一，审查项目的是投资人的权力。如果项目方拒绝给提供资料，投资人可以投诉给移民局。LP协议上明确了投资人的一些权力，移民局会审查投资人行使这些权力的相关资料。我现在还要雇我的投资人帮我督察项目的运作呢。让投资人自己督察项目的进展，达到各项指标，保证他们的永久绿卡通过，5年后资金的返回。我现在事情太多，就把一些职责转给别人做。我为我的投资人在我合伙人的势力范围内找份工作。所以我们的EB-5投资项目是：投资50万，拿一张绿卡，得一份工作。点击展开...如果项目方都能这么负责任，哪还会有今天投资人那么多的顾虑那？

  ·中文新闻 悉尼铁路工会纠纷：避免火车混乱的协议细节浮出水面
·中文新闻 为什么比尔·肖顿体现了澳大利亚政治最好和最坏的一面